<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lexmark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://madisonian.net/2004/10/26/lexmark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://madisonian.net/2004/10/26/lexmark/</link>
	<description>a blog about law, tech, culture, and related things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:58:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Copyfight</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2004/10/26/lexmark/comment-page-1/#comment-3588</link>
		<dc:creator>Copyfight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 17:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=58#comment-3588</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Michael Madison on DMCA Misuse&lt;/strong&gt;
Michael Madison, analyzing a species of technical/legal hack under the DMCA as interpreted by the courts in the Lexmark and Chamberlain cases: &quot;Intuitively, then, this sounds like an extreme version of the sort of design abuse that the court in...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Michael Madison on DMCA Misuse</strong><br />
Michael Madison, analyzing a species of technical/legal hack under the DMCA as interpreted by the courts in the Lexmark and Chamberlain cases: &#8220;Intuitively, then, this sounds like an extreme version of the sort of design abuse that the court in&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Copyfight</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2004/10/26/lexmark/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Copyfight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=58#comment-18</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Key to a Good (Fair Use) Defense&lt;/strong&gt;
...is a good offense. That&#039;s the message of Fred von Lohmann&#039;s latest column at Law.com, which urges ISPs and online publishers to take advantage of the recent ruling in OPG v. Diebold to level the playing field with copyright holders...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Key to a Good (Fair Use) Defense</strong><br />
&#8230;is a good offense. That&#8217;s the message of Fred von Lohmann&#8217;s latest column at Law.com, which urges ISPs and online publishers to take advantage of the recent ruling in OPG v. Diebold to level the playing field with copyright holders&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
