<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DMCA Misuse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://madisonian.net/2005/04/04/dmca-misuse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://madisonian.net/2005/04/04/dmca-misuse/</link>
	<description>a blog about law, tech, culture, and related things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:32:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Zagar's Brain on Copyright</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2005/04/04/dmca-misuse/comment-page-1/#comment-3596</link>
		<dc:creator>Zagar's Brain on Copyright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 07:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=145#comment-3596</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Misinterpretations of Lexmark, Chamberlain.&lt;/strong&gt;
Short version:  The major lesson of Lexmark/Chamberlain, which these guys seem to have missed, is that there is no such thing as unauthorized access for a consumer who obtained their digital content legitimately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Misinterpretations of Lexmark, Chamberlain.</strong><br />
Short version:  The major lesson of Lexmark/Chamberlain, which these guys seem to have missed, is that there is no such thing as unauthorized access for a consumer who obtained their digital content legitimately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Copyfight</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2005/04/04/dmca-misuse/comment-page-1/#comment-3587</link>
		<dc:creator>Copyfight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 17:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=145#comment-3587</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Michael Madison on DMCA Misuse&lt;/strong&gt;
Michael Madison, analyzing a species of technical/legal hack under the DMCA as interpreted by the courts in the Lexmark and Chamberlain cases: &quot;Intuitively, then, this sounds like an extreme version of the sort of design abuse that the court in...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Michael Madison on DMCA Misuse</strong><br />
Michael Madison, analyzing a species of technical/legal hack under the DMCA as interpreted by the courts in the Lexmark and Chamberlain cases: &#8220;Intuitively, then, this sounds like an extreme version of the sort of design abuse that the court in&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

