<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Limiting Software Licenses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://madisonian.net/2005/04/05/limiting-software-licenses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://madisonian.net/2005/04/05/limiting-software-licenses/</link>
	<description>a blog about law, tech, culture, and related things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:59:42 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Infothought</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2005/04/05/limiting-software-licenses/comment-page-1/#comment-3595</link>
		<dc:creator>Infothought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 05:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=146#comment-3595</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Krause v. Titleserv : software licenses limited - but outlier facts&lt;/strong&gt;
Less helpful against mass-market EULA&#039;s than it seems, because of atypical facts. 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Krause v. Titleserv : software licenses limited &#8211; but outlier facts</strong><br />
Less helpful against mass-market EULA&#8217;s than it seems, because of atypical facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Copyfight</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2005/04/05/limiting-software-licenses/comment-page-1/#comment-3594</link>
		<dc:creator>Copyfight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 21:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=146#comment-3594</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;EULA/Anti-EULA&lt;/strong&gt;
Michael Madison, clearly on roll, points to a recent Seventh Circuit ruling[PDF] that gives those victimized by End User License Agreements (EULAs) new hope: &quot;If a software user merely &#039;licenses&#039; the software, then (allegedly) the rights of &#039;owners...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>EULA/Anti-EULA</strong><br />
Michael Madison, clearly on roll, points to a recent Seventh Circuit ruling[PDF] that gives those victimized by End User License Agreements (EULAs) new hope: &#8220;If a software user merely &#8216;licenses&#8217; the software, then (allegedly) the rights of &#8216;owners&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

