<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on Krause and Software Licenses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://madisonian.net/2005/04/07/more-on-krause-and-software-licenses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://madisonian.net/2005/04/07/more-on-krause-and-software-licenses/</link>
	<description>a blog about law, tech, culture, and related things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:32:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Infothought</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2005/04/07/more-on-krause-and-software-licenses/comment-page-1/#comment-3601</link>
		<dc:creator>Infothought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 10:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=152#comment-3601</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;More on software licenses and the &quot;Krause&quot; case - the worse, the more valid?&lt;/strong&gt;
It all seems to be saying that the more restrictive a licensing
&quot;agreement&quot;, the more likely a court will find that it is a
valid licensed-not-sold situation, and hence the most effective action
is to make the &quot;license&quot; as onerous as possible!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>More on software licenses and the &#8220;Krause&#8221; case &#8211; the worse, the more valid?</strong><br />
It all seems to be saying that the more restrictive a licensing<br />
&#8220;agreement&#8221;, the more likely a court will find that it is a<br />
valid licensed-not-sold situation, and hence the most effective action<br />
is to make the &#8220;license&#8221; as onerous as possible!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

