<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: StorageTek Troubles Me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://madisonian.net/2005/08/25/storagetek-troubles-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://madisonian.net/2005/08/25/storagetek-troubles-me/</link>
	<description>a blog about law, tech, culture, and related things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:59:42 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Lahser</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2005/08/25/storagetek-troubles-me/comment-page-1/#comment-15131</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Lahser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 05:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/?p=313#comment-15131</guid>
		<description>Listen to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentpod.com/2005/09/storage-technology-v-custom-hardware.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;StorageTek v. Custom Hardware Engineering&lt;/a&gt; on your iPod or MP3 player.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listen to the <a href="http://www.patentpod.com/2005/09/storage-technology-v-custom-hardware.html" rel="nofollow">StorageTek v. Custom Hardware Engineering</a> on your iPod or MP3 player.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madisonian.net &#187; EULA Developments</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2005/08/25/storagetek-troubles-me/comment-page-1/#comment-13229</link>
		<dc:creator>madisonian.net &#187; EULA Developments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 14:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/?p=313#comment-13229</guid>
		<description>[...] Purely as a matter of contract law, there can be little further doubt (if any doubters remained) that EULAs and similar offer-by-notice-and-acceptance-by-conduct Terms and Conditions are enforceable in virtually all domains of commercial activity, not just software. In the contracts arena, consumer advocates won the UCITA battle but are losing the ProCD war. (And they&#8217;re losing it on the authority of the patent law experts at the Federal Circuit!) What remains of a meaningful &#8220;assent&#8221; requirement is slowly, but surely, disappearing altogether.    Trackback URL: http://madisonian.net/archives/2005/09/02/eula-developments/trackback/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Purely as a matter of contract law, there can be little further doubt (if any doubters remained) that EULAs and similar offer-by-notice-and-acceptance-by-conduct Terms and Conditions are enforceable in virtually all domains of commercial activity, not just software. In the contracts arena, consumer advocates won the UCITA battle but are losing the ProCD war. (And they&#8217;re losing it on the authority of the patent law experts at the Federal Circuit!) What remains of a meaningful &#8220;assent&#8221; requirement is slowly, but surely, disappearing altogether.    Trackback URL: <a href="http://madisonian.net/archives/2005/09/02/eula-developments/trackback/" rel="nofollow">http://madisonian.net/archives/2005/09/02/eula-developments/trackback/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

