<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Socially Created Value</title>
	<atom:link href="http://madisonian.net/2005/12/09/socially-created-value/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://madisonian.net/2005/12/09/socially-created-value/</link>
	<description>a blog about law, tech, culture, and related things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:32:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MT</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2005/12/09/socially-created-value/comment-page-1/#comment-20784</link>
		<dc:creator>MT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2005 01:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/?p=459#comment-20784</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve &lt;a href=&quot;http://murkythoughts.blogspot.com/2005/10/anthropology-of-intellectual-property.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blogged a little&lt;/a&gt; about the social incentive for creativity and how it gets monetized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve <a href="http://murkythoughts.blogspot.com/2005/10/anthropology-of-intellectual-property.html" rel="nofollow">blogged a little</a> about the social incentive for creativity and how it gets monetized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2005/12/09/socially-created-value/comment-page-1/#comment-20612</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 01:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/?p=459#comment-20612</guid>
		<description>&quot;Only a relatively few savvy businesses ...&quot;

No big mystery.

The problem is that data-mining is *hard*, and LOW-MARGIN. Whereas rent-seeking with a monoply is, if not exactly easy, not as hard, and with substantial higher margins.

Note there are lot of business gurus trying to make money off being advocates of low-margin data-mining, rather than actually going into the business of low-margin data-mining. That should tell you something about the industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Only a relatively few savvy businesses &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>No big mystery.</p>
<p>The problem is that data-mining is *hard*, and LOW-MARGIN. Whereas rent-seeking with a monoply is, if not exactly easy, not as hard, and with substantial higher margins.</p>
<p>Note there are lot of business gurus trying to make money off being advocates of low-margin data-mining, rather than actually going into the business of low-margin data-mining. That should tell you something about the industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MT</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2005/12/09/socially-created-value/comment-page-1/#comment-20609</link>
		<dc:creator>MT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 17:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/?p=459#comment-20609</guid>
		<description>How does a horse monopoly become a car company, before cars have been invented? That a battleship of industry ever adapts, as a rule of thumb, must be due to its head start and deep pockets, so if the guys in their R&amp;D department invent only a moped, the corporation can hang in there and outlast and coopt the guys who invent the car. I guess the liability to worry about is that WaPo won&#039;t have the money to buy out the inventers of the business model we&#039;re waiting for--or they&#039;ll be outbid by Murdoch. But there&#039;s culture and idealism in the blogosphere too. A new kind of business with 10,000 Ben &amp; Jerry&#039;s as partners might be picky about who they allow to buy them or under what terms they&#039;ll accept venture captial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does a horse monopoly become a car company, before cars have been invented? That a battleship of industry ever adapts, as a rule of thumb, must be due to its head start and deep pockets, so if the guys in their R&amp;D department invent only a moped, the corporation can hang in there and outlast and coopt the guys who invent the car. I guess the liability to worry about is that WaPo won&#8217;t have the money to buy out the inventers of the business model we&#8217;re waiting for&#8211;or they&#8217;ll be outbid by Murdoch. But there&#8217;s culture and idealism in the blogosphere too. A new kind of business with 10,000 Ben &amp; Jerry&#8217;s as partners might be picky about who they allow to buy them or under what terms they&#8217;ll accept venture captial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

