http://madisonian.net/2006/03/01/copyrights-trial-of-the-century/ a blog about law, tech, culture, and related things Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:59:42 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://madisonian.net/2006/03/01/copyrights-trial-of-the-century/comment-page-1/#comment-21208 Mike Madison Thu, 02 Mar 2006 18:15:51 +0000 http://madisonian.net/?p=567#comment-21208 What they might ask for, and what they might settle for, are very probably two different things. What they might ask for, and what they might settle for, are very probably two different things.

]]> http://madisonian.net/2006/03/01/copyrights-trial-of-the-century/comment-page-1/#comment-21203 Ian P. Hudson Thu, 02 Mar 2006 15:54:44 +0000 http://madisonian.net/?p=567#comment-21203 Surely the plaintiffs should be asking not that release of the movie be prevented but that they be given a slice of the profits; they'd get a lot more that way. Surely the plaintiffs should be asking not that release of the movie be prevented but that they be given a slice of the profits; they’d get a lot more that way.

]]> http://madisonian.net/2006/03/01/copyrights-trial-of-the-century/comment-page-1/#comment-21202 Mike Madison Thu, 02 Mar 2006 14:22:57 +0000 http://madisonian.net/?p=567#comment-21202 It's 2006. "Trial of the century" applied today to any legal field is Parodic Rhetorical Overkill, or PRO. It’s 2006. “Trial of the century” applied today to any legal field is Parodic Rhetorical Overkill, or PRO.

]]> http://madisonian.net/2006/03/01/copyrights-trial-of-the-century/comment-page-1/#comment-21196 greg Thu, 02 Mar 2006 04:27:15 +0000 http://madisonian.net/?p=567#comment-21196 Honestly dunno either -- not to lose that question, but I'm trying to grok the "Trial of the Century" label. You mean because of the amount of money and the defendant? It's late here, perhaps I'm missing something. Honestly dunno either — not to lose that question, but I’m trying to grok the “Trial of the Century” label. You mean because of the amount of money and the defendant? It’s late here, perhaps I’m missing something.

]]>