<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: P2P Surveillance vs. the Whiggishness of Networks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://madisonian.net/2006/06/12/p2p-surveillance-vs-the-whiggishness-of-networks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://madisonian.net/2006/06/12/p2p-surveillance-vs-the-whiggishness-of-networks/</link>
	<description>a blog about law, tech, culture, and related things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:59:42 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2006/06/12/p2p-surveillance-vs-the-whiggishness-of-networks/comment-page-1/#comment-42550</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 14:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/?p=681#comment-42550</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with you, Carlos.  I think it&#039;s not only a major contribution to law &amp; technology studies, but also to economics generally. The more economists start taking the ideas in WN seriously, the better a chance we have at really solving difficult distributional and development issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with you, Carlos.  I think it&#8217;s not only a major contribution to law &amp; technology studies, but also to economics generally. The more economists start taking the ideas in WN seriously, the better a chance we have at really solving difficult distributional and development issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos Leyva</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2006/06/12/p2p-surveillance-vs-the-whiggishness-of-networks/comment-page-1/#comment-42525</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos Leyva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 13:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/?p=681#comment-42525</guid>
		<description>Whiggishness noted, however Benkler deserves a ton of credit for recognizing his own bias and offering plausible contra evidence. This aspect notwithstanding, WN is an awesome achievement &amp; as Lessig has noted: &quot;perhaps the most important book on the topic in the last ten years.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whiggishness noted, however Benkler deserves a ton of credit for recognizing his own bias and offering plausible contra evidence. This aspect notwithstanding, WN is an awesome achievement &amp; as Lessig has noted: &#8220;perhaps the most important book on the topic in the last ten years.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

