<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anti-Commodification Principles as Egalitarian Leverage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://madisonian.net/2006/07/18/anti-commodification-principles-as-egalitarian-leverage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://madisonian.net/2006/07/18/anti-commodification-principles-as-egalitarian-leverage/</link>
	<description>a blog about law, tech, culture, and related things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:32:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: madisonian.net &#187; Facts and Values in Political Debates</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2006/07/18/anti-commodification-principles-as-egalitarian-leverage/comment-page-1/#comment-60743</link>
		<dc:creator>madisonian.net &#187; Facts and Values in Political Debates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 18:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/?p=707#comment-60743</guid>
		<description>[...] There&#8217;s been a spirited discussion of one of my posts here. (Okay, &#8220;spirited debate&#8221; is my euphemism for &#8220;clobbering&#8221;). I&#8217;d like to get some sense of why we&#8217;re so deeply divided. For now, I&#8217;m turning to this article, which tries to disentangle individuals&#8217; value priorities from factual judgments. (Yes, I admit, it&#8217;s experimental philosophy, which I usually find less than helpful). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There&#8217;s been a spirited discussion of one of my posts here. (Okay, &#8220;spirited debate&#8221; is my euphemism for &#8220;clobbering&#8221;). I&#8217;d like to get some sense of why we&#8217;re so deeply divided. For now, I&#8217;m turning to this article, which tries to disentangle individuals&#8217; value priorities from factual judgments. (Yes, I admit, it&#8217;s experimental philosophy, which I usually find less than helpful). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TRUTH ON THE MARKET &#187; Organ Markets, Social Justice, and the Poor: A Reply to Professor Pasquale</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2006/07/18/anti-commodification-principles-as-egalitarian-leverage/comment-page-1/#comment-60585</link>
		<dc:creator>TRUTH ON THE MARKET &#187; Organ Markets, Social Justice, and the Poor: A Reply to Professor Pasquale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 20:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/?p=707#comment-60585</guid>
		<description>[...] Frank Pasquale at Madisonian is concerned that organ markets do not show enough concern for the poor. He writes: I’d be more sympathetic to the economic approach to the topic if it showed a bit more concern for the plight of those unable to pay for organs (and for the very poor in LDC’s whose organs are most likely to be utilized). There are many ways to do so: Steven Calandrillo’s approach to the topic is one of the best current treatments that injects concerns of social justice into the organ shortage crisis. In short, I think I’d be ready for an organ market if one were to tax all the transactions to assure wider access to the less advantaged. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Frank Pasquale at Madisonian is concerned that organ markets do not show enough concern for the poor. He writes: I’d be more sympathetic to the economic approach to the topic if it showed a bit more concern for the plight of those unable to pay for organs (and for the very poor in LDC’s whose organs are most likely to be utilized). There are many ways to do so: Steven Calandrillo’s approach to the topic is one of the best current treatments that injects concerns of social justice into the organ shortage crisis. In short, I think I’d be ready for an organ market if one were to tax all the transactions to assure wider access to the less advantaged. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

