Comments on: More on the Future of Legal Scholarship http://madisonian.net/2006/09/08/more-on-the-future-of-legal-scholarship/ a blog about law, tech, culture, and related things Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:59:42 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: The Fire of Genius » Breaking walls, building links http://madisonian.net/2006/09/08/more-on-the-future-of-legal-scholarship/comment-page-1/#comment-75593 The Fire of Genius » Breaking walls, building links Sat, 09 Sep 2006 14:37:31 +0000 http://madisonian.net/?p=787#comment-75593 [...] I agree with Geoff :  Mike Madison’s post about technology and legal scholarship, yesterday at Madisonian, is a must-read for lawprofs.  It’s concise and provocative (in other words, vintage Madison). [...] [...] I agree with Geoff :  Mike Madison’s post about technology and legal scholarship, yesterday at Madisonian, is a must-read for lawprofs.  It’s concise and provocative (in other words, vintage Madison). [...]

]]> By: TRUTH ON THE MARKET » Mike Madison on the future of legal scholarship http://madisonian.net/2006/09/08/more-on-the-future-of-legal-scholarship/comment-page-1/#comment-75198 TRUTH ON THE MARKET » Mike Madison on the future of legal scholarship Fri, 08 Sep 2006 19:14:56 +0000 http://madisonian.net/?p=787#comment-75198 [...] It occurs to me that pretty much the only “must-read” posts I find are at Larry’s blog.  Sensibly enough, as he is the . . . what do they call it . . . ”blogfather” of this blog.  But once in a while a post shows up elsewhere that cries for (positive) attention.  Today that post comes from Madisonian.  No, it’s not by our old friend, Frank Pasquale.  It’s by Mike Madison, Madisonian’s in-house “blogfather.”  It’s called — and I seriously urge you to rush over and read it right now — More on the Future of Legal Scholarship. [...] [...] It occurs to me that pretty much the only “must-read” posts I find are at Larry’s blog.  Sensibly enough, as he is the . . . what do they call it . . . ”blogfather” of this blog.  But once in a while a post shows up elsewhere that cries for (positive) attention.  Today that post comes from Madisonian.  No, it’s not by our old friend, Frank Pasquale.  It’s by Mike Madison, Madisonian’s in-house “blogfather.”  It’s called — and I seriously urge you to rush over and read it right now — More on the Future of Legal Scholarship. [...]

]]> By: Mike Madison http://madisonian.net/2006/09/08/more-on-the-future-of-legal-scholarship/comment-page-1/#comment-75173 Mike Madison Fri, 08 Sep 2006 17:52:28 +0000 http://madisonian.net/?p=787#comment-75173 Frank is referring to <a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=899122" rel="nofollow">this essay</a>, which touches on related themes. Frank is referring to this essay, which touches on related themes.

]]> By: Frank Pasquale http://madisonian.net/2006/09/08/more-on-the-future-of-legal-scholarship/comment-page-1/#comment-75156 Frank Pasquale Fri, 08 Sep 2006 16:34:46 +0000 http://madisonian.net/?p=787#comment-75156 Mike, I think you should refer people to your piece on Open Access Legal Scholarship. The "tagging" idea there is a terrific way of constructively taking the pressure off the "where is it published stage," and, instead, focusing people on a long process of post-publication peer-review and comment. Jon Mermin's Essay in Rutgers, Remaking LAw Review, is also a superb vision of possible futures for legal scholarship. Finally, I recommend my colleague Charles Sullivan's post here: http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/09/shepardizing_th_1.html which briefly discusses your tagging idea. Mike, I think you should refer people to your piece on Open Access Legal Scholarship. The “tagging” idea there is a terrific way of constructively taking the pressure off the “where is it published stage,” and, instead, focusing people on a long process of post-publication peer-review and comment.

Jon Mermin’s Essay in Rutgers, Remaking LAw Review, is also a superb vision of possible futures for legal scholarship.

Finally, I recommend my colleague Charles Sullivan’s post here:

http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/09/shepardizing_th_1.html

which briefly discusses your tagging idea.

]]>