<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Wired Redesign: A Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://madisonian.net/2007/03/01/the-wired-redesign-a-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://madisonian.net/2007/03/01/the-wired-redesign-a-review/</link>
	<description>a blog about law, tech, culture, and related things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:32:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: greglas</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2007/03/01/the-wired-redesign-a-review/comment-page-1/#comment-179133</link>
		<dc:creator>greglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 02:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/archives/2007/03/01/the-wired-redesign-a-review/#comment-179133</guid>
		<description>Hey, it&#039;s 12 bucks a year!  

Inertia is a pretty good excuse -- though I subscribe mostly because I&#039;m holding out for one more CueCat.  I love my Wired CueCat!  :-)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CueCat

Fwiw, other Wired Readers also have moments of self-doubt:
http://www.peterme.com/archives/000060.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, it&#8217;s 12 bucks a year!  </p>
<p>Inertia is a pretty good excuse &#8212; though I subscribe mostly because I&#8217;m holding out for one more CueCat.  I love my Wired CueCat!  <img src='http://madisonian.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CueCat" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CueCat</a></p>
<p>Fwiw, other Wired Readers also have moments of self-doubt:<br />
<a href="http://www.peterme.com/archives/000060.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.peterme.com/archives/000060.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Madison</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2007/03/01/the-wired-redesign-a-review/comment-page-1/#comment-178952</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Madison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 20:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/archives/2007/03/01/the-wired-redesign-a-review/#comment-178952</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s inertia, of course.  Also, you (Eric) are much closer to the Bay Area -- the Fountain of Technological Hip -- than I am, and you were even when you didn&#039;t live there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s inertia, of course.  Also, you (Eric) are much closer to the Bay Area &#8212; the Fountain of Technological Hip &#8212; than I am, and you were even when you didn&#8217;t live there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Goldman</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2007/03/01/the-wired-redesign-a-review/comment-page-1/#comment-178923</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Goldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 19:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/archives/2007/03/01/the-wired-redesign-a-review/#comment-178923</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe you still subscribe!  It feels like I dropped my subscription a decade ago (OK, it was probably only 6-7 years ago).  Eric.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe you still subscribe!  It feels like I dropped my subscription a decade ago (OK, it was probably only 6-7 years ago).  Eric.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greglas</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2007/03/01/the-wired-redesign-a-review/comment-page-1/#comment-178832</link>
		<dc:creator>greglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 16:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/archives/2007/03/01/the-wired-redesign-a-review/#comment-178832</guid>
		<description>It is a Conde Nast publications (Vogue, GQ).  I always thought the lack of readability and the &quot;we&#039;re so much cooler than anyone reading this&quot; was consistent with the Fashion Mag ethos: a feature, not a bug.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a Conde Nast publications (Vogue, GQ).  I always thought the lack of readability and the &#8220;we&#8217;re so much cooler than anyone reading this&#8221; was consistent with the Fashion Mag ethos: a feature, not a bug.  <img src='http://madisonian.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

