<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Prestige</title>
	<atom:link href="http://madisonian.net/2007/03/21/the-prestige/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://madisonian.net/2007/03/21/the-prestige/</link>
	<description>a blog about law, tech, culture, and related things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:59:42 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Goldman's Observations</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2007/03/21/the-prestige/comment-page-1/#comment-196865</link>
		<dc:creator>Goldman's Observations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 05:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/archives/2007/03/21/the-prestige/#comment-196865</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Legislative Audiences for Law Review Articles...&lt;/strong&gt;

Cardozo Law School held an event entitled &quot;Trends in Federal Judicial Citations and Law Review Articles&quot; where 7 appellate judges......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Legislative Audiences for Law Review Articles&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Cardozo Law School held an event entitled &#8220;Trends in Federal Judicial Citations and Law Review Articles&#8221; where 7 appellate judges&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Rapoport</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2007/03/21/the-prestige/comment-page-1/#comment-189619</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Rapoport</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 10:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/archives/2007/03/21/the-prestige/#comment-189619</guid>
		<description>I like your framing of the question even better than mine, and I&#039;m often surprised when people who aren&#039;t law profs have (1) said they&#039;ve read something I&#039;ve written and (2) said they liked it.  I think that we (law professors) spend so much time with our heads down, writing, that we forget to look up and see the rest of the world.

And I think that we have many reasons to write, some of which are better reasons than others.  I write now because I think I have something to say and--now that I have my free speech rights back (I&#039;m no longer a dean)--I can&#039;t seem to shut up. (Grin.)  Others write to play the &quot;my brain is bigger than your brain&quot; game that they learned in law school.  Still others write because they&#039;ve been told that they must.  And a few write because they have truly original things to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your framing of the question even better than mine, and I&#8217;m often surprised when people who aren&#8217;t law profs have (1) said they&#8217;ve read something I&#8217;ve written and (2) said they liked it.  I think that we (law professors) spend so much time with our heads down, writing, that we forget to look up and see the rest of the world.</p>
<p>And I think that we have many reasons to write, some of which are better reasons than others.  I write now because I think I have something to say and&#8211;now that I have my free speech rights back (I&#8217;m no longer a dean)&#8211;I can&#8217;t seem to shut up. (Grin.)  Others write to play the &#8220;my brain is bigger than your brain&#8221; game that they learned in law school.  Still others write because they&#8217;ve been told that they must.  And a few write because they have truly original things to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

