<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Online Adventures of Tom Sawyer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://madisonian.net/2007/05/01/the-online-adventures-of-tom-sawyer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://madisonian.net/2007/05/01/the-online-adventures-of-tom-sawyer/</link>
	<description>a blog about law, tech, culture, and related things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:59:42 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2007/05/01/the-online-adventures-of-tom-sawyer/comment-page-1/#comment-206714</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 20:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/archives/2007/05/01/the-online-adventures-of-tom-sawyer/#comment-206714</guid>
		<description>Okay, I get the point better now.  I think that&#039;s why I tried to push the debate on Trebor&#039;s ideas more toward democratic norms and transparency in the &quot;context providers&quot; that make all the money &quot;off the backs of&quot; the users.

Of course, as James Grimmelmann points out, I haven&#039;t specified exactly how that will work.  But a piece Oren Bracha and I are now working on will give some idea of what the very successful context providers owe their communities, and the community as a whole.

Perhaps also the emphasis should be less on &quot;compensate the workers&quot; than a focus on potential &quot;unjust enrichment.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I get the point better now.  I think that&#8217;s why I tried to push the debate on Trebor&#8217;s ideas more toward democratic norms and transparency in the &#8220;context providers&#8221; that make all the money &#8220;off the backs of&#8221; the users.</p>
<p>Of course, as James Grimmelmann points out, I haven&#8217;t specified exactly how that will work.  But a piece Oren Bracha and I are now working on will give some idea of what the very successful context providers owe their communities, and the community as a whole.</p>
<p>Perhaps also the emphasis should be less on &#8220;compensate the workers&#8221; than a focus on potential &#8220;unjust enrichment.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Madison</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2007/05/01/the-online-adventures-of-tom-sawyer/comment-page-1/#comment-206654</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Madison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 11:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/archives/2007/05/01/the-online-adventures-of-tom-sawyer/#comment-206654</guid>
		<description>The metaphoric struggle is as interesting as the debate on the merits.  Of course, the metaphoric struggle *is* the debate on the merits.  &quot;They&#039;re working&quot; vs. &quot;they&#039;re playing&quot; is the &quot;Tastes Great!&quot; vs. &quot;Less Filling!&quot; of the 21st century, that is, an endless, pointless debate.  (Oops! Metaphors again!)  So instead we search for the &quot;right&quot; description:  whitewashing the fence?  sharecropping?  The challenge here isn&#039;t the Cardozo-ish &quot;take care that metaphors may enslave us&quot;; Cardozo had it -- metaphorically -- backwards.  We&#039;re constrained here analytically precisely because we *haven&#039;t* yet found the right metaphor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The metaphoric struggle is as interesting as the debate on the merits.  Of course, the metaphoric struggle *is* the debate on the merits.  &#8220;They&#8217;re working&#8221; vs. &#8220;they&#8217;re playing&#8221; is the &#8220;Tastes Great!&#8221; vs. &#8220;Less Filling!&#8221; of the 21st century, that is, an endless, pointless debate.  (Oops! Metaphors again!)  So instead we search for the &#8220;right&#8221; description:  whitewashing the fence?  sharecropping?  The challenge here isn&#8217;t the Cardozo-ish &#8220;take care that metaphors may enslave us&#8221;; Cardozo had it &#8212; metaphorically &#8212; backwards.  We&#8217;re constrained here analytically precisely because we *haven&#8217;t* yet found the right metaphor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2007/05/01/the-online-adventures-of-tom-sawyer/comment-page-1/#comment-206609</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 03:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/archives/2007/05/01/the-online-adventures-of-tom-sawyer/#comment-206609</guid>
		<description>I saw a great presentation on this topic; my post on it (With a link to Susan Crawford&#039;s take) is here: 

http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/04/is_myspace_expl.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw a great presentation on this topic; my post on it (With a link to Susan Crawford&#8217;s take) is here: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/04/is_myspace_expl.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/04/is_myspace_expl.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

