<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Since We&#8217;re Talking About Disclosure and Free Speech&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://madisonian.net/2007/05/07/since-were-talking-about-disclosure-and-free-speech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://madisonian.net/2007/05/07/since-were-talking-about-disclosure-and-free-speech/</link>
	<description>a blog about law, tech, culture, and related things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:32:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Handing over customer records as protected speech?</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2007/05/07/since-were-talking-about-disclosure-and-free-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-207907</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Handing over customer records as protected speech?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 12:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/archives/2007/05/07/since-were-talking-about-disclosure-and-free-speech/#comment-207907</guid>
		<description>[...] On the day I learn (hat tip Media Law Prof Blog) that US not-for-profit NGO Freedom House has released its annual global Freedom of the Press Survey for 2007 (Ireland fares reasonably well - equal thirteenth in Europe, equal sixteenth worldwide - but we could do better), I also learn (hat tip madisonian.net) that Verizon have made an extraordinarily tendentious free speech argument in favour of disclosing customer records to the US security services. Ars technica reports: Verizon is one of the phone companies currently being sued over its alleged disclosure of customer phone records to the NSA. In a response to the court last week, the company asked for the entire consolidated case against it to be thrown out—on free speech grounds. &#8230; [their] &#8220;right to communicate such information to the government is fully protected by the Free Speech and Petition Clauses of the First Amendment,&#8221; argue Verizon&#8217;s lawyers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On the day I learn (hat tip Media Law Prof Blog) that US not-for-profit NGO Freedom House has released its annual global Freedom of the Press Survey for 2007 (Ireland fares reasonably well &#8211; equal thirteenth in Europe, equal sixteenth worldwide &#8211; but we could do better), I also learn (hat tip madisonian.net) that Verizon have made an extraordinarily tendentious free speech argument in favour of disclosing customer records to the US security services. Ars technica reports: Verizon is one of the phone companies currently being sued over its alleged disclosure of customer phone records to the NSA. In a response to the court last week, the company asked for the entire consolidated case against it to be thrown out—on free speech grounds. &#8230; [their] &#8220;right to communicate such information to the government is fully protected by the Free Speech and Petition Clauses of the First Amendment,&#8221; argue Verizon&#8217;s lawyers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

