<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Presidential Candidates and Technology Policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://madisonian.net/2007/05/12/presidential-candidates-and-technology-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://madisonian.net/2007/05/12/presidential-candidates-and-technology-policy/</link>
	<description>a blog about law, tech, culture, and related things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:59:42 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2007/05/12/presidential-candidates-and-technology-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-209078</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 18:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/archives/2007/05/12/presidential-candidates-and-technology-policy/#comment-209078</guid>
		<description>Fantastic issue to cover.  As an admin law person, I am very interested in the tech coordination angle here, too.  Would the candidate get some sort of czar, or at least White House coordinator, to try to develop a coherent approach?  Consider that NN issues are the FCC&#039;s bailiwick, which is totally separate from the Copyright Office, which is apart from USPTO.  

On the other hand, given Boyle&#039;s critique of Clinton&#039;s NII paper, perhaps we want less coordination, not more!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic issue to cover.  As an admin law person, I am very interested in the tech coordination angle here, too.  Would the candidate get some sort of czar, or at least White House coordinator, to try to develop a coherent approach?  Consider that NN issues are the FCC&#8217;s bailiwick, which is totally separate from the Copyright Office, which is apart from USPTO.  </p>
<p>On the other hand, given Boyle&#8217;s critique of Clinton&#8217;s NII paper, perhaps we want less coordination, not more!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

