Comments on: Web 2.0 Bill of Rights? http://madisonian.net/2007/09/09/web-20-bill-of-rights/ a blog about law, tech, culture, and related things Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:59:42 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: John McCrea http://madisonian.net/2007/09/09/web-20-bill-of-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-224140 John McCrea Tue, 11 Sep 2007 01:03:42 +0000 http://madisonian.net/archives/2007/09/09/web-20-bill-of-rights/#comment-224140 One of the most important questions is whether the fastest growing "walled garden," Facebook, will hear the call and reverse their claims to "ownership of the social graph." Right now, they are avoiding all the public venues where the topic is being discussed. Here's my coverage of the Data Sharing Summit (and Facebook no-showing there): http://therealmccrea.wordpress.com/2007/09/09/facebook-snubs-data-sharing-summit/ One of the most important questions is whether the fastest growing “walled garden,” Facebook, will hear the call and reverse their claims to “ownership of the social graph.” Right now, they are avoiding all the public venues where the topic is being discussed. Here’s my coverage of the Data Sharing Summit (and Facebook no-showing there): http://therealmccrea.wordpress.com/2007/09/09/facebook-snubs-data-sharing-summit/

]]> By: Kevin OKeefe http://madisonian.net/2007/09/09/web-20-bill-of-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-224139 Kevin OKeefe Mon, 10 Sep 2007 04:05:31 +0000 http://madisonian.net/archives/2007/09/09/web-20-bill-of-rights/#comment-224139 Not sure if this online discussion is anymore than would take place offline. The issue becomes, as you say, the permanence of Google. But regulating web discussion is not something I am in favor - even is we wrap it in a 'bill of rights.' Not sure if this online discussion is anymore than would take place offline. The issue becomes, as you say, the permanence of Google.

But regulating web discussion is not something I am in favor – even is we wrap it in a ‘bill of rights.’

]]>