<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Paper on the Commander in Chief&#8217;s Powers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://madisonian.net/2007/11/15/new-paper-on-the-commander-in-chiefs-powers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://madisonian.net/2007/11/15/new-paper-on-the-commander-in-chiefs-powers/</link>
	<description>a blog about law, tech, culture, and related things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:32:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frank Pasquale</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2007/11/15/new-paper-on-the-commander-in-chiefs-powers/comment-page-1/#comment-224481</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Pasquale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 16:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/archives/2007/11/15/new-paper-on-the-commander-in-chiefs-powers/#comment-224481</guid>
		<description>Sounds very interesting.  The temporal point about &quot;before and after&quot; reminds me of a recent podcast by Stephen Pinker on his book The Stuff of Thought, which looks at the strange slipperiness of the idea of the present.  Literally speaking, there is no &quot;end&quot; of a ribbon, and no recognizable present...every moment instantly becoming past at its recognition as present.  But anyway, I&#039;m sure such metaphysical concerns needn&#039;t detain an argument like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds very interesting.  The temporal point about &#8220;before and after&#8221; reminds me of a recent podcast by Stephen Pinker on his book The Stuff of Thought, which looks at the strange slipperiness of the idea of the present.  Literally speaking, there is no &#8220;end&#8221; of a ribbon, and no recognizable present&#8230;every moment instantly becoming past at its recognition as present.  But anyway, I&#8217;m sure such metaphysical concerns needn&#8217;t detain an argument like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

