<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Play &amp; Reputation Economies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://madisonian.net/2008/01/03/play-reputation-economies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://madisonian.net/2008/01/03/play-reputation-economies/</link>
	<description>a blog about law, tech, culture, and related things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:32:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greg Lastowka</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2008/01/03/play-reputation-economies/comment-page-1/#comment-230416</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Lastowka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 13:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/archives/2008/01/03/play-reputation-economies/#comment-230416</guid>
		<description>Yes, I agree completely that there is an intersection between reputation economies and market economies.  &quot;Fame&quot; and &quot;Fortune&quot; often go hand in hand -- I have several pages looking into that in the Digital Attribution paper.

The interesting thing, for me, is how they don&#039;t go hand in hand at time.  Certainly there&#039;s a very different rhetorical tone that we see employed with regard to economies based on sharing (Mike talks about this in &quot;A Pattern-Oriented Approach to Fair Use&quot;).  See, e.g., the way Richard Stallman and the Free Software Foundation approach IP issues vs. credit issues.  Reputation economies are much more easily tied into normative and moral concepts, which are more suppressed in market economies. 

And I don&#039;t think you&#039;re suggesting this, but I think we&#039;d make a mistake if we thought of the pursuit of reputation as something that can be easily subsumed in a market economic approach.  If anything, it ought to be the other way around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I agree completely that there is an intersection between reputation economies and market economies.  &#8220;Fame&#8221; and &#8220;Fortune&#8221; often go hand in hand &#8212; I have several pages looking into that in the Digital Attribution paper.</p>
<p>The interesting thing, for me, is how they don&#8217;t go hand in hand at time.  Certainly there&#8217;s a very different rhetorical tone that we see employed with regard to economies based on sharing (Mike talks about this in &#8220;A Pattern-Oriented Approach to Fair Use&#8221;).  See, e.g., the way Richard Stallman and the Free Software Foundation approach IP issues vs. credit issues.  Reputation economies are much more easily tied into normative and moral concepts, which are more suppressed in market economies. </p>
<p>And I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;re suggesting this, but I think we&#8217;d make a mistake if we thought of the pursuit of reputation as something that can be easily subsumed in a market economic approach.  If anything, it ought to be the other way around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Donovan</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2008/01/03/play-reputation-economies/comment-page-1/#comment-230400</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Donovan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 07:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/archives/2008/01/03/play-reputation-economies/#comment-230400</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always found Yahoo Answers to be a fascinating example of motivation. They have been able to create a wildly successful service motivating people with &quot;points.&quot; Amazon gold might be hokey, but I don&#039;t think it is any different than Yahoo points. 

The real question is whether the reputation economy exists outside the market economy. I don&#039;t think it does. Linux programmers motivated by reputation-seeking want to capitalize on that by being hired in the traditional market, right? Reputation has very real implications in the market economy and I think that drives people to be of renown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always found Yahoo Answers to be a fascinating example of motivation. They have been able to create a wildly successful service motivating people with &#8220;points.&#8221; Amazon gold might be hokey, but I don&#8217;t think it is any different than Yahoo points. </p>
<p>The real question is whether the reputation economy exists outside the market economy. I don&#8217;t think it does. Linux programmers motivated by reputation-seeking want to capitalize on that by being hired in the traditional market, right? Reputation has very real implications in the market economy and I think that drives people to be of renown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

