<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Focus on Quality of Scholarship, Rather than Placement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://madisonian.net/2008/04/08/a-focus-on-quality-of-scholarship-rather-than-placement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://madisonian.net/2008/04/08/a-focus-on-quality-of-scholarship-rather-than-placement/</link>
	<description>a blog about law, tech, culture, and related things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:22:44 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greg Lastowka</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2008/04/08/a-focus-on-quality-of-scholarship-rather-than-placement/comment-page-1/#comment-246550</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Lastowka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 18:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/?p=1366#comment-246550</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; Now, I strenuously argue in favor of reading pieces, rather than substituting one biased gauge of quality (citations) for another biased gauge (placement). 

Me too!  (And does anyone openly argue *against* that?)

&gt;&gt; That, anyway, is the kind of law school I’d like to see–where hiring committees rally around a candidate by saying, “she wrote a great article!” rather than “she published in UCLA!”

The fact that the latter doesn&#039;t strike us as *obviously* less desirable than the former, I think, is evidence of a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>> Now, I strenuously argue in favor of reading pieces, rather than substituting one biased gauge of quality (citations) for another biased gauge (placement). </p>
<p>Me too!  (And does anyone openly argue *against* that?)</p>
<p>>> That, anyway, is the kind of law school I’d like to see–where hiring committees rally around a candidate by saying, “she wrote a great article!” rather than “she published in UCLA!”</p>
<p>The fact that the latter doesn&#8217;t strike us as *obviously* less desirable than the former, I think, is evidence of a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
