<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Dueling the Answer?  Thoughts on AutoAdmit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://madisonian.net/2008/08/01/is-dueling-the-answer-thoughts-on-autoadmit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://madisonian.net/2008/08/01/is-dueling-the-answer-thoughts-on-autoadmit/</link>
	<description>a blog about law, tech, culture, and related things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:59:42 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frank Pasquale</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2008/08/01/is-dueling-the-answer-thoughts-on-autoadmit/comment-page-1/#comment-256875</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Pasquale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 22:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/?p=1458#comment-256875</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a nice connection.  The AA situation also reminds me a bit of Rebecca Tushnet on the multiple audiences for an ad or label or TM.  Should false advertising regulation assume the worst or the best audiences, or some middling one?  A web-savvy person would probably assume at least some of the AA comments were totally fictitious, or tasteless trollign with no basis in reality.  But not all HR managers or police or other perceivers of them are web-savvy.  And one must always worry about the one crazy who actually intends to do what he mentions on the board.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a nice connection.  The AA situation also reminds me a bit of Rebecca Tushnet on the multiple audiences for an ad or label or TM.  Should false advertising regulation assume the worst or the best audiences, or some middling one?  A web-savvy person would probably assume at least some of the AA comments were totally fictitious, or tasteless trollign with no basis in reality.  But not all HR managers or police or other perceivers of them are web-savvy.  And one must always worry about the one crazy who actually intends to do what he mentions on the board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greglas</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2008/08/01/is-dueling-the-answer-thoughts-on-autoadmit/comment-page-1/#comment-256680</link>
		<dc:creator>greglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 21:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/?p=1458#comment-256680</guid>
		<description>This article is actually my favorite piece of writing by Lessig.  Code was well-written and certainly more popular, but I always liked this one better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is actually my favorite piece of writing by Lessig.  Code was well-written and certainly more popular, but I always liked this one better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

