<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Law and Institutional Capital</title>
	<atom:link href="http://madisonian.net/2008/08/13/law-and-institutional-capital/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://madisonian.net/2008/08/13/law-and-institutional-capital/</link>
	<description>a blog about law, tech, culture, and related things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:32:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2008/08/13/law-and-institutional-capital/comment-page-1/#comment-257507</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 16:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/?p=1468#comment-257507</guid>
		<description>I like Wendell Berry&#039;s distinction between &quot;settlers&quot; and &quot;colonizers,&quot; described in The Unsettling of America.  The former actually develop a place, whereas the latter extract all the resources they can and then move on.   But I&#039;m afraid that Berry-an social thought has been elbowed aside by economists&#039; colonization of the legal (among other) academies.

Coming from Buffalo, and having lived in struggling parts of DC and Jersey City, I see your point here.  I am often frustrated by economists&#039; verdicts that we should just let certain regions decline: 
http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/03/from_gradgrind.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Wendell Berry&#8217;s distinction between &#8220;settlers&#8221; and &#8220;colonizers,&#8221; described in The Unsettling of America.  The former actually develop a place, whereas the latter extract all the resources they can and then move on.   But I&#8217;m afraid that Berry-an social thought has been elbowed aside by economists&#8217; colonization of the legal (among other) academies.</p>
<p>Coming from Buffalo, and having lived in struggling parts of DC and Jersey City, I see your point here.  I am often frustrated by economists&#8217; verdicts that we should just let certain regions decline:<br />
<a href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/03/from_gradgrind.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/03/from_gradgrind.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Lipshaw</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2008/08/13/law-and-institutional-capital/comment-page-1/#comment-257494</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Lipshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 09:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/?p=1468#comment-257494</guid>
		<description>Great post.  I&#039;m from Detroit, lived seven years in Indianapolis, and taught for a year in New Orleans, so I know whereof you speak.  

Isn&#039;t this the great frustration of every economic development agency trying to replicate Silicon Valley?  Indeed, Silicon Valley arose serendipitously and organically, as did the Detroit of 1915.  There IS a critical mass or tipping point, but culling the data to find it in order to develop a predictive mechanism of replication is either (a) impossible because there is something irreducible in there, or (b) so complex that it might as well be irreducible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.  I&#8217;m from Detroit, lived seven years in Indianapolis, and taught for a year in New Orleans, so I know whereof you speak.  </p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t this the great frustration of every economic development agency trying to replicate Silicon Valley?  Indeed, Silicon Valley arose serendipitously and organically, as did the Detroit of 1915.  There IS a critical mass or tipping point, but culling the data to find it in order to develop a predictive mechanism of replication is either (a) impossible because there is something irreducible in there, or (b) so complex that it might as well be irreducible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Miller</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2008/08/13/law-and-institutional-capital/comment-page-1/#comment-257425</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/?p=1468#comment-257425</guid>
		<description>Beautiful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

