<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Comcast Order and Network Neutrality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://madisonian.net/2008/08/21/the-comcast-order-and-network-neutrality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://madisonian.net/2008/08/21/the-comcast-order-and-network-neutrality/</link>
	<description>a blog about law, tech, culture, and related things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:22:44 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam Candeub</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2008/08/21/the-comcast-order-and-network-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-257990</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Candeub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/?p=1475#comment-257990</guid>
		<description>Hey Brett!  Good post!  And you&#039;re right, as with all FCC pronouncements there is &quot;plenty to digest,&quot;  lots of fat that could&#039;ve been trimmed, indeed.

My first concern with the order is its &quot;case-by-case&quot; approach.  Beyond the administrative law issues of whether Title I allows such an FCC power grab--which will send us all scurrying back to Title 47 and Brand X, I&#039;m not sure that approach will allow for reasoned, rule-based internet policy.

From my read so far, the only rule I detect is that Kevin Martin&#039;s idee fixe is to screw the cable industry and the dems like network neutrality.  Forgive my cynicism so early in the semester . . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Brett!  Good post!  And you&#8217;re right, as with all FCC pronouncements there is &#8220;plenty to digest,&#8221;  lots of fat that could&#8217;ve been trimmed, indeed.</p>
<p>My first concern with the order is its &#8220;case-by-case&#8221; approach.  Beyond the administrative law issues of whether Title I allows such an FCC power grab&#8211;which will send us all scurrying back to Title 47 and Brand X, I&#8217;m not sure that approach will allow for reasoned, rule-based internet policy.</p>
<p>From my read so far, the only rule I detect is that Kevin Martin&#8217;s idee fixe is to screw the cable industry and the dems like network neutrality.  Forgive my cynicism so early in the semester . . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
