<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Derivative of a Derivative</title>
	<atom:link href="http://madisonian.net/2008/09/10/derivative-of-a-derivative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://madisonian.net/2008/09/10/derivative-of-a-derivative/</link>
	<description>a blog about law, tech, culture, and related things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:59:42 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Madison</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2008/09/10/derivative-of-a-derivative/comment-page-1/#comment-260111</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Madison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/?p=1499#comment-260111</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m in the fortunate and probably uncommon position of having seen Rear Window (many times, but that&#039;s not extraordinary), seen Disturbia (only once, and that was enough), and read It Had to Be Murder (there is reason that Hitchcock&#039;s movie is a classic, and the story is mostly forgotten).  In fact, I own a copy of the story and, within the bounds of copyright, would be happy to find a way to share it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in the fortunate and probably uncommon position of having seen Rear Window (many times, but that&#8217;s not extraordinary), seen Disturbia (only once, and that was enough), and read It Had to Be Murder (there is reason that Hitchcock&#8217;s movie is a classic, and the story is mostly forgotten).  In fact, I own a copy of the story and, within the bounds of copyright, would be happy to find a way to share it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Boyden</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2008/09/10/derivative-of-a-derivative/comment-page-1/#comment-260110</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Boyden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/?p=1499#comment-260110</guid>
		<description>The only one of these 3 works I&#039;ve seen/read is &quot;Rear Window&quot; so I&#039;m not able to comment directly on your comparison. But it seems like the overriding &quot;similarity&quot; here is in the premise -- and the premise is pretty far up the abstraction scale, I think. Sure, there&#039;s Daly v. Palmer -- woman tied down to a railroad track by evil villain found infringing (!) -- but that&#039;s from the 19th century.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only one of these 3 works I&#8217;ve seen/read is &#8220;Rear Window&#8221; so I&#8217;m not able to comment directly on your comparison. But it seems like the overriding &#8220;similarity&#8221; here is in the premise &#8212; and the premise is pretty far up the abstraction scale, I think. Sure, there&#8217;s Daly v. Palmer &#8212; woman tied down to a railroad track by evil villain found infringing (!) &#8212; but that&#8217;s from the 19th century.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

