<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Stop Piracy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://madisonian.net/2009/04/17/how-to-stop-piracy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://madisonian.net/2009/04/17/how-to-stop-piracy/</link>
	<description>a blog about law, tech, culture, and related things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:59:42 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: C.E. Petit</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2009/04/17/how-to-stop-piracy/comment-page-1/#comment-276408</link>
		<dc:creator>C.E. Petit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/?p=2237#comment-276408</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s actually quite a bit of historical evidence, drawn from trademarks and in particular from fashion and from agricultural products, on how to defeat piracy of IP. The method that has positive correlation has three elements:
(1) A price for the authorized good/service that does not greatly exceed the price for the pirated good/service;
(2) A discernable -- not necessarily huge -- difference in ancillary value provided with the authorized good/service; and
(3) A customer-perceived system of reliable quality control.

So far as I&#039;m aware, direct suppression campaigns have a 0% success rate in the long run; those who remember the casual-outerwear market in the 1980s probably have an inkling of that already!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s actually quite a bit of historical evidence, drawn from trademarks and in particular from fashion and from agricultural products, on how to defeat piracy of IP. The method that has positive correlation has three elements:<br />
(1) A price for the authorized good/service that does not greatly exceed the price for the pirated good/service;<br />
(2) A discernable &#8212; not necessarily huge &#8212; difference in ancillary value provided with the authorized good/service; and<br />
(3) A customer-perceived system of reliable quality control.</p>
<p>So far as I&#8217;m aware, direct suppression campaigns have a 0% success rate in the long run; those who remember the casual-outerwear market in the 1980s probably have an inkling of that already!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

