<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A copyright radio ad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://madisonian.net/2009/06/30/a-copyright-radio-ad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://madisonian.net/2009/06/30/a-copyright-radio-ad/</link>
	<description>a blog about law, tech, culture, and related things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:32:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Madison</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2009/06/30/a-copyright-radio-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-281076</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Madison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/?p=2621#comment-281076</guid>
		<description>Fred, I&#039;ve heard this ad playing around the country for the last several weeks (I&#039;ve heard it from Maryland to Minnesota to Colorado, at least).  The curious thing is its absolute lack of context.  &quot;Tax=bad&quot; is its rhetorical punch, and in rural America, where I&#039;ve heard the ad, maybe the broadcasters think that&#039;s enough.  There is nothing about copyright, nothing about performers or songwriters, nothing about access to music, or even apple pie and Mom.

So, I wonder whether this sort of ultra-reductionism is a good thing or a bad thing on the whole.  Is this approach a one-off situation, or should it be adapted to other copyright and IP policy debates?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred, I&#8217;ve heard this ad playing around the country for the last several weeks (I&#8217;ve heard it from Maryland to Minnesota to Colorado, at least).  The curious thing is its absolute lack of context.  &#8220;Tax=bad&#8221; is its rhetorical punch, and in rural America, where I&#8217;ve heard the ad, maybe the broadcasters think that&#8217;s enough.  There is nothing about copyright, nothing about performers or songwriters, nothing about access to music, or even apple pie and Mom.</p>
<p>So, I wonder whether this sort of ultra-reductionism is a good thing or a bad thing on the whole.  Is this approach a one-off situation, or should it be adapted to other copyright and IP policy debates?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

