<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samuelson v. Sergei</title>
	<atom:link href="http://madisonian.net/2009/10/15/samuelson-v-sergei/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://madisonian.net/2009/10/15/samuelson-v-sergei/</link>
	<description>a blog about law, tech, culture, and related things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:59:42 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greg Lastowka</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2009/10/15/samuelson-v-sergei/comment-page-1/#comment-296472</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Lastowka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/?p=3198#comment-296472</guid>
		<description>Pam won for sure.  Re Brin&#039;s hubris, it seems to be bugging folks, but is it really so uncommon to find celebrity billionaires with perspective problems?

If this had been a fair use fight, I&#039;d be 100% on Google&#039;s side -- well, maybe 99%.  And despite grumbling about their missteps, I&#039;m still a big Google fan.

It&#039;s just that when your company gets to be so big and you&#039;re the 800-pound gorilla in the digital economy, every misstep you make is going to crush those around you.

At some point, the baton will be passed: IBM--&gt;Microsoft--&gt;Google.
I don&#039;t think we&#039;re *quite* there yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pam won for sure.  Re Brin&#8217;s hubris, it seems to be bugging folks, but is it really so uncommon to find celebrity billionaires with perspective problems?</p>
<p>If this had been a fair use fight, I&#8217;d be 100% on Google&#8217;s side &#8212; well, maybe 99%.  And despite grumbling about their missteps, I&#8217;m still a big Google fan.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just that when your company gets to be so big and you&#8217;re the 800-pound gorilla in the digital economy, every misstep you make is going to crush those around you.</p>
<p>At some point, the baton will be passed: IBM&#8211;&gt;Microsoft&#8211;&gt;Google.<br />
I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;re *quite* there yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2009/10/15/samuelson-v-sergei/comment-page-1/#comment-296468</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 20:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/?p=3198#comment-296468</guid>
		<description>Well, they&#039;re not going to get broken up. So that leaves us with only one other option....a federal search commission!  

But Mike, actually I think the pro-Google sentiment is pretty strong among innovation academics still.  I still get really skeptical questions about even the most minimalist proposals regarding *monitoring* of them--not even regulation.  

That&#039;s one reason I&#039;m focusing some current research on fusion centers and government collaboration with internet intermediaries for surveillance purposes. &quot;Big gubmint&quot; is already in your search engine--now let&#039;s try to get it to vindicate some basic consumer protections and other public values.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, they&#8217;re not going to get broken up. So that leaves us with only one other option&#8230;.a federal search commission!  </p>
<p>But Mike, actually I think the pro-Google sentiment is pretty strong among innovation academics still.  I still get really skeptical questions about even the most minimalist proposals regarding *monitoring* of them&#8211;not even regulation.  </p>
<p>That&#8217;s one reason I&#8217;m focusing some current research on fusion centers and government collaboration with internet intermediaries for surveillance purposes. &#8220;Big gubmint&#8221; is already in your search engine&#8211;now let&#8217;s try to get it to vindicate some basic consumer protections and other public values.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

