Comments on: When is a Cell Phone Not a Cell Phone? http://madisonian.net/2009/10/19/when-is-a-cell-phone-not-a-cell-phone/ a blog about law, tech, culture, and related things Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:59:42 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Anna http://madisonian.net/2009/10/19/when-is-a-cell-phone-not-a-cell-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-297322 Anna Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:03:03 +0000 http://madisonian.net/?p=3238#comment-297322 That's right.The cell phones could be used as TV,game box and so on. That’s right.The cell phones could be used as TV,game box and so on.

]]> By: Tony http://madisonian.net/2009/10/19/when-is-a-cell-phone-not-a-cell-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-297179 Tony Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:18:05 +0000 http://madisonian.net/?p=3238#comment-297179 How could there be consumer confusion? The consumer asked MetroPCS to do this. Trademark law has been moving away too much from protecting consumers to protecting corporations. How could there be consumer confusion? The consumer asked MetroPCS to do this. Trademark law has been moving away too much from protecting consumers to protecting corporations.

]]> By: Cell Spy Software http://madisonian.net/2009/10/19/when-is-a-cell-phone-not-a-cell-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-297166 Cell Spy Software Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:03:03 +0000 http://madisonian.net/?p=3238#comment-297166 I agree with the MetroPCS philosophy of product and service. Unless Verizon was the manufacturer or exclusive licensee holder then there shouldn't be any issue. In this case, they are neither, so the lawsuit is just a waste of time and money. I agree with the MetroPCS philosophy of product and service. Unless Verizon was the manufacturer or exclusive licensee holder then there shouldn’t be any issue.

In this case, they are neither, so the lawsuit is just a waste of time and money.

]]>