<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital Labor at the New School</title>
	<atom:link href="http://madisonian.net/2009/10/27/digital-labor-at-the-new-school/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://madisonian.net/2009/10/27/digital-labor-at-the-new-school/</link>
	<description>a blog about law, tech, culture, and related things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:32:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Madison</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2009/10/27/digital-labor-at-the-new-school/comment-page-1/#comment-298192</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Madison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/?p=3286#comment-298192</guid>
		<description>True, true.  To your Kafka, how about a Groucho?  (He of &quot;wouldn&#039;t join a club that would accept him as a member&quot; fame.)  If I&#039;ve commoditized your friends (for portability purposes), should I count that as an asset or a liability?  I&#039;m talking about the concept, not the pragmatics; I know that people rely on their FB friend lists.

But as I read more and more news coverage of proposed &quot;three strikes&quot; legislation from European governments (download illegally too many times, and you&#039;re cut off from the net), I&#039;m tempted to pull a Clint Eastwood:  Go ahead.  Make my day.  Make me stop drinking from the firehose!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, true.  To your Kafka, how about a Groucho?  (He of &#8220;wouldn&#8217;t join a club that would accept him as a member&#8221; fame.)  If I&#8217;ve commoditized your friends (for portability purposes), should I count that as an asset or a liability?  I&#8217;m talking about the concept, not the pragmatics; I know that people rely on their FB friend lists.</p>
<p>But as I read more and more news coverage of proposed &#8220;three strikes&#8221; legislation from European governments (download illegally too many times, and you&#8217;re cut off from the net), I&#8217;m tempted to pull a Clint Eastwood:  Go ahead.  Make my day.  Make me stop drinking from the firehose!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2009/10/27/digital-labor-at-the-new-school/comment-page-1/#comment-298146</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 03:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/?p=3286#comment-298146</guid>
		<description>Good point, Mike.  I think I would follow Joe Turow, Mireille Hildebrandt, and Dan Solove in arguing that much of this profiling is secret and undetectable.  I take your Pogo reference and raise with a Kafka!

For example, I was recently complaining about the new Facebook feed and someone said: &quot;well, you can just quit.&quot;  But can I bring dozens of friends with me to some other social network?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, Mike.  I think I would follow Joe Turow, Mireille Hildebrandt, and Dan Solove in arguing that much of this profiling is secret and undetectable.  I take your Pogo reference and raise with a Kafka!</p>
<p>For example, I was recently complaining about the new Facebook feed and someone said: &#8220;well, you can just quit.&#8221;  But can I bring dozens of friends with me to some other social network?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Madison</title>
		<link>http://madisonian.net/2009/10/27/digital-labor-at-the-new-school/comment-page-1/#comment-298139</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Madison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonian.net/?p=3286#comment-298139</guid>
		<description>A provocative concept for discussion, to be sure.  I am bothered by the apparent elision of agency in the description, which mentions how &quot;we are commoditized, racialized, and engendered.&quot;  To what extent does Pogo&#039;s motto apply?  &quot;We have met the enemy and he is us.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A provocative concept for discussion, to be sure.  I am bothered by the apparent elision of agency in the description, which mentions how &#8220;we are commoditized, racialized, and engendered.&#8221;  To what extent does Pogo&#8217;s motto apply?  &#8220;We have met the enemy and he is us.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

