Believing, then Seeing

“[S]ecular Americans …  think that belief precedes action and explains choice. That’s part of our folk model of the mind: that belief comes first.”  from @tanyaluhrmann in this NYTimes op-ed about the roles of faith and belief in evangelical communities.

I sometimes see intellectual property law and policy discussions through a similar lens:  People want to believe that IP does all of the things that it is said that IP does, so they proceed (law, policy, scholarship) accordingly.

But there is much more to all of this than what might appear to be simply willing suspension of dis-belief, or some obvious circular reasoning.  The reasoning metaphor, and the presumption that we reason first, are out of place.  Luhrmann, still in the Times, writes:

I saw that people went to church to experience joy and to learn how to have more of it. These days I find that it is more helpful to think about faith as the questions people choose to focus on, rather than the propositions observers think they must hold.

If you can sidestep the problem of belief — and the related politics, which can be so distracting — it is easier to see that the evangelical view of the world is full of joy. God is good. The world is good. Things will be good, even if they don’t seem good now. That’s what draws people to church. It is understandably hard for secular observers to sidestep the problem of belief. But it is worth appreciating that in belief is the reach for joy, and the reason many people go to church in the first place.

Talk among IP circles of motivations and incentives that drives creativity and innovation — even talk that focuses, as it should on non-monetary or non-financial incentives — misses, I think, at least a good chunk of this.   The “reach for joy” resonates as an ideal far beyond evangelical or even more generally spiritual settings.  Artists and scientists are, too, engaged in a kind of reach for joy — and all the more so when we expand the frame to think not only in terms of internal rewards (“I feel joy”) but external ones as well (“I share joy”).

(Post title borrowed from @dewittjones and his “Celebrate What’s Right” video, though the sentiment doesn’t originate with him.)

The Unwinding

George Packer’s new “The Unwinding” is “something close to a nonfiction masterpiece,” says Dwight Garner in the New York Times:

If you were born after 1960, Mr. Packer suggests, you have spent much of your life watching structures long in place collapsing — things like farms, factories, subdivisions and public schools on the one hand, and “ways and means in Washington caucus rooms, taboos on New York trading desks” and “manners and morals everywhere” on the other.

What has replaced them, he says, is organized money, as well as a society in which “winners win bigger than ever, floating away like bloated dirigibles, and losers have a long way to fall before they hit bottom, and sometimes they never do.”

Politics and Innovation, Silicon Valley-Style

George Packer 1, Steven Johnson 0.

Johnson tries to take down Packer’s critique of the contemporary Silicon Valley plutocracy, but he misses the mark.  Packer, a Palo Alto native, knows what he’s talking about when he compares the Valley today to the Valley he knew growing up there in the 1960s and 1970s.  (Read Packer’s New Yorker piece — link below — then read his Blood of the Liberals.)

What might our innovation economy look like if it were suffused today with the political culture that gave us Pete McCoskey, rather than a culture that still evokes Ed Zschau?

References:

  • George Packer, Change the World
  • Steven Johnson, Learning From Los Gatos (full marks, however, for the wink and nod to Robert Venturi and Denise Scott Brown, even if Los Gatos has long been far from the soul of the Valley)