|
2009
Section Officers
Chair:
Stacey Dogan
Northeastern University
Visiting Professor,
Boston University School of Law
s.dogan[at]neu[dot]edu
Chair-Elect:
Katherine Strandburg
DePaul University
kstradb[at]depaul[dot]edu
Executive Board:
Greg Lastowka
Rutgers University
lastowka[at]camden[dot]rutgers[dot]edu
Joseph Liu
Boston College
liujr[at]bc[dot]edu
IP Conference Schedule
Section ByLaws
Links
Copyright
Society of the U.S.A.
International
Association for the Advancement of Teaching & Research in Intellectual
Property
International
Trademark Association
National
Association of Patent Practitioners
National
Patent Law Association
U.S.
Copyright Office
U.S.
Patent & Trademark Office
World
Intellectual Property Organization
Webmaster
Michael Madison
University of Pittsburgh School of Law
madison[at]law[dot]pitt[dot]edu
Last revised:
April 3, 2009
|
The Intellectual Property Law Section of the Association of American Law Schools was organized to facilitate the study of intellectual property
in American law schools and to provide a forum for law faculty members engaged in the teaching of intellectual property and related subjects to exchange ideas. Scholarship
[the entries below are
obtained via the electronic version of the Current Index to Legal
Periodicals; beginning with February 2007, the dates indicated correspond to
the publication date of the CILP]
June 2009
-
Bitton, Miriam. Exploring
European Union copyright policy through the lens of the database
directive. 23 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1411-1470 (2008).
-
Blair-Stanek, Andrew.
Increased market power as a new secondary consideration in patent law.
58 Am. U. L. Rev. 707-746 (2009).
-
Bradford, Laura R. Emotion,
dilution, and the trademark consumer. 23 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1227-1298
(2008).
-
Creighton, Susan A. and Scott
A. Sher. Resolving patent disputes through merger: a comparison of
three potential approaches. 75 Antitrust L.J. 657-690 (2009).
-
Eiland, Murry Lee. The
institutional role in arbitrating patent disputes. 9 Pepp. Disp. Resol.
L.J. 283-323 (2009).
-
Field, Ted L. Improving the
Federal Circuit’s approach to choice of law for procedural matters in
patent cases. 16 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 643-699 (2009).
-
Frazer, Brad. Open source is
not public domain: evolving licensing philosophies. 45 Idaho L. Rev.
349-375 (2009).
-
Ginsburg, Jane C. The
author’s place in the future of copyright. 45 Willamette L. Rev.
381-394 (2009).
-
The Law, Culture, and
Economics of Fashion. Article by C. Scott Hemphill and Jeannie Suk;
response by Kal Raustiala and Christopher Sprigman; reply by C. Scott
Hemphill and Jeannie Suk. 61 Stan. L. Rev. 1147-1232 (2009).
-
Jaynes, Andrew. Why
intellectual property rights infringement remains entrenched in the
Philippines. 21 Pace Int’l L. Rev. 55-135 (2009).
-
Katz, Ariel. Substitution and
Schumpeterian effects over the life cycle of copyrighted works. 49
Jurimetrics J. 113-153 (2009).
-
Kelly, David M. and Stephanie
H. Bald. 2008 trademark decisions of the Federal Circuit. 58 Am. U. L.
Rev. 947-973 (2009).
-
King, Sandra Leigh. While you
were sleeping. 11 SMU Sci. & Tech. L. Rev. 291-335 (2008).
-
Kwoka, Margaret B.
Vindicating the rights of people living with AIDS under the Alien Tort
Claims Act. 40 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 643-689 (2009).
-
Lee, Peter. Contracting to
preserve open science: consideration-based regulation in patent law.
58 Emory L.J. 889-975 (2009).
-
Lefstin, Jeffrey A. A formal
structure of patent law and the limits of enablement. 23 Berkeley Tech.
L.J. 1141-1225 (2008).
-
Lund, Jamie. Copyright
genericide. 42 Creighton L. Rev. 131-156 (2009).
-
Malkan, Jeffrey. Rule-based
expression in copyright law. 57 Buff. L. Rev. 433-509 (2009).
-
Mota, Sue Ann. The doctrine of
patent Pierce, N. Scott. Common sense: treating statutory nonobviousness
as a novelty issue. 25 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L.J. 539-646
(2009).
-
Munzer, Stephen R. and Phyllis
Chen Simon. Territory, plants, and land-use rights among the San of
Southern Africa: a case study in regional biodiversity, traditional
knowledge, and intellectual property. 17 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J.
831-894 (2009).
-
Neal, James G. A lay
perspective on the copyright wars: a report from the trenches of the
Section 108 Study Group. Horace S. Manges Lecture: April 1, 2008.
32 Colum. J.L. & Arts 193-205 (2009).
-
Sarnoff, Joshua D. and
Christopher M. Holman. Recent developments affecting the enforcement,
procurement, and licensing of research tool patents. 23 Berkeley Tech.
L.J. 1299-1366 (2008).
-
Schwartz, David L. Courting
specialization: an empirical study of claim construction comparing
patent litigation before federal district courts and the International
Trade Commission. 50 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1699-1737 (2009).
-
Storm, Christopher S. Federal
patent takings. 2 J. Bus. Entrepreneurship & L. 1-29 (2008).
-
Takenaka, Toshiko. Success or
failure? Japan’s national strategy on intellectual property and
evaluation of its impact from the comparative law perspective. 8 Wash.
U. Global Stud. L. Rev. 379-398 (2009).
-
Thambisetty, Sivaramjani.
Legal transplants in patent law: why “utility” in the new “industrial
applicability”. 49 Jurimetrics J. 155-201 (2009).
-
Torrance, Andrew W.
Physiological steps doctrine. 23 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1471-1505 (2008).
-
Williams, Matt. Congress
should amend the Copyright Act to protect transactional watermarks. 23
Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1367-1409 (2008).
-
Zubler, Todd, et al. 2008
patent law decisions of the Federal Circuit. 58 Am. U. L. Rev. 747-945
(2009).
May 2009
-
Anderson, Horace E., Jr.
“Criminal minded?”: mixtape DJs, the piracy paradox, and lessons from
the recording industry. 76 Tenn. L. Rev. 111-158 (2008).
-
Anderson, J. Jonas. Hiding
behind nationality: the temporary presence exception and patent
infringement avoidance. 15 Mich. Telecomm. & Tech. L. Rev. 1-51 (2008).
-
Balganesh, Shyamkrishna.
Foreseeability and copyright incentives. 122 Harv. L. Rev. 1569-1633
(2009).
-
Bently, Lionel. R. v. The
Author: from death penalty to community service. 20th Annual
Horace S. Manges Lecture, Tuesday, April 10, 2007. 32 Colum. J.L. &
Arts 1-109 (2008).
-
Braegelmann, Tom. Copyright law in and
under the Constitution: a comparison between American and German
constitutional copyright law. 27 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J. 99-144
(2009).
-
Buzzacchi, Luigi and Giuseppe
Scellato. Patent litigation insurance and R&D incentives. 28 Int’l
Rev. L. & Econ. 272-286 (2008).
-
Dinwoodie, Graeme B.
Developing defenses in trademark law. 13 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 99-153
(2009).
-
Erlinger, Michael, Jr. An
analog solution in a digital world: providing federal copyright
protection for pre-1972 sound recordings. 16 UCLA Ent. L. Rev. 45-78
(2009).
-
Feldman, Yuval. The
expressive function of trade secret law: legality, cost, intrinsic
motivation, and consensus. 6 J. Empirical Legal Stud. 177-212 (2009)
-
Fromer, Jeanne C. Patent
disclosure. 94 Iowa L. Rev. 539-606 (2009).
-
Golden, John M. The Supreme
Court as “prime percolator”: a prescription for appellate review of
questions in patent law. 56 UCLA L. Rev. 657-724 (2009).
-
Grinvald, Leah Chan. Making
much ado about theory: the Chinese Trademark Law. 15 Mich. Telecomm. &
Tech. L. Rev. 53-106 (2008).
-
Hirshman, Neil S., Michael G. Fatall and
Peter M. Spingola. Is silence really golden? Assumption and assignment
of intellectual property licenses in bankruptcy. 3 Hastings Bus. L.J.
197-221 (2007).
-
Ho, Cynthia M. Patent
breaking or balancing?: separating strands of fact from fiction under
TRIPS. 34 N.C. J. Int’l L. & Com. Reg. 371-469 (2009).
-
Karjala, Dennis S. Judicial oversight of copyright legislation. 35 N.
Ky. L. Rev. 253-279 (2008).
-
Locke, Zac. How to save the
recording industry?: charge less. 16 UCLA Ent. L. Rev. 79-88 (2009).
-
Mueller, Janice M. Chemicals,
combinations, and “common sense”: how the Supreme Court’s KSR
decision is changing Federal Circuit obviousness determinations in
pharmaceutical and biotechnology cases. 35 N. Ky. L. Rev. 281-314
(2008).
-
Munzer, Stephen R. and Kal Raustiala.
The uneasy case for intellectual property rights in traditional
knowledge. 27 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J. 37-97 (2009).
-
Oguamanam, Chidi. Patents and
traditional medicine: digital capture, creative legal interventions and
the dialectics of knowledge transformation. 15 Ind. J. Global Legal
Stud. 489-528 (2008).
-
O’Regan, Cecily Anne. Is
intellectual property a hurdle for transferring technology to developing
countries? If so, how high a hurdle? 1 Hastings Sci. & Tech. L.J. 1-19
(2009).
-
Petherbridge, Lee. The claim
construction effect. 15 Mich. Telecomm. & Tech. L. Rev. 215-266 (2008).
-
Server, Alfred C., M.D., Nader
Mousavi and Jane M. Love. Reach-through rights and the patentability,
enforcement, and licensing of patents on drug discovery tools. 1
Hastings Sci. & Tech. L.J. 21-121 (2009).
-
Spellman, Barbara A. and
Frederick Schauer. Artists’ moral rights and the psychology of
ownership. 83 Tul. L. Rev. 661-678 (2009).
-
Vertinsky, Liza.
Reconsidering patent licensing in the aftermath of MedImmune. 45
Hous. L. Rev. 1609-1657 (2009).
-
Weirich, C. Geoffrey and
Daniel P. Hart. Protecting trade secrets and confidential information
in Georgia. 60 Mercer L. Rev. 533-561 (2009).
-
White, Katherine E. How the Supreme
Court’s decisions over the last decade have re-shaped Federal Circuit
jurisprudence. 35 N. Ky. L. Rev. 315-324 (2008).
April 2009
-
Armstrong, Timothy K. Fair
circumvention. 74 Brook. L. Rev. 1-50 (2008).
-
Burrell, Robert and Kimberlee
Weatherall. Exporting controversy? Reactions to the copyright
provisions of the U.S.-Australia Free Trade Agreement: lessons for U.S.
trade policy. 2008 U. Ill. J.L. Tech. & Pol’y 259-319.
-
Chiappetta, Vincent. Employee
blogs and trade secrets: legal response to technological change. 11
NEXUS 31-44 (2006).
-
de Werra, Jacques. Fighting
against biopiracy: does the obligation to disclose in patent
applications truly help? 42 Vand. J. Transnat’l L. 143-179 (2009).
-
Durham, Alan L. Natural laws
and inevitable infringement. 93 Minn. L. Rev. 933-997 (2009).
-
Eng, Regina Nelson. A
likelihood of infringement. The purchase and sale of trademarks as
AdWords. 18 Alb. L.J. Sci. & Tech. 493-541 (2008).
-
Fagundes, David. Crystals in
the public domain. 50 B.C. L. Rev. 139-195 (2009).
-
Gherman, Sergiu. Harmony and
functionality: a gloss on the substantial similarity test in music
copyright. 19 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 483-517 (2009).
-
Gore, Kiran Nasir. Trademark
battles in a Babrie-cyber world: trademark protection of website domain
names and the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act. 31 Hastings
Comm. & Ent. L.J. 193-221 (2009).
-
Greenbaum, Dov. Academia to
industry technology transfer: an alternative to the Bayh-Dole system
for both developed and developing nations. 19 Fordham Intell. Prop.
Media & Ent. L.J. 311-411 (2009).
-
Kane, Eileen M.
Patent-mediated standards in genetic testing. 2008 Utah L. Rev.
835-874.
-
Newman, Daniel E. Portraying a
branded world. 2008 U. Ill. J.L. Tech. & Pol’y 357-381.
-
Ng, Alina. The social
contract and authorship: allocating entitlements in the copyright
system. 19 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 413-482 (2009).
-
Nihoul, Paul. The limitation
of intellectual property in the name of competition. 32 Fordham Int’l
L.J. 489-524 (2009).
-
Osborn, Lucas. Tax strategy
patents: why the tax community should not exclude the patent system.
18 Alb. L.J. Sci. & Tech. 325-380 (2008).
-
Pessach, Guy. Reciprocal
share-alike exemptions in copyright law. 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1245-1294
(2008).
-
Rabinowitz, Aaron B. Criminal
prosecution for copyright infringement of unregistered works: a bite at
an unripe apple? 49 Santa Clara L. Rev. 793-819 (2009).
-
Robins, Martin B.
Intellectual property and information technology due diligence in
mergers and acquisitions: a more substantive approach needed. 2008 U.
Ill. J.L. Tech. & Pol’y 321-356.
-
Roin, Benjamin N.
Unpatentable drugs and the standards of patentability. 87 Tex. L. Rev.
503-570 (2009).
-
Shi, Wei. Incurable or
remediable? Clues to undoing the Gordian knot tied by intellectual
property rights enforcement in China. 30 U. Pa. J. Int’l L. 541-583
(2008).
-
Snow, Ned. Copytraps. 84
Ind. L.J. 285-329 (2009).
-
Sovacool, Benjamin K. Placing
a glove on the invisible hand: how intellectual property rights may
impede innovation in energy research and development (R & D). 18 Alb.
L.J. Sci. & Tech. 381-440 (2008).
-
Strandburg, Katherine J.
Evolving innovation paradigms and the global intellectual property
regime. 41 Conn. L. Rev. 861-920 (2009).
-
Whaley, Sean D. “I’m a
highway star”: an outline for a federal right of publicity. 31
Hastings Comm. & Ent. L.J. 257-282 (2009).
-
Winickoff, David E., Krishanu
Saha and Gregory D. Graff. Opening stem cell research and development:
a policy proposal for the management of data, intellectual property, and
ethics. 9 Yale J. Health Pol’y L. & Ethics 52-127 (2009).
March 2009
-
Adler, Amy M. Against moral
rights. 97 Cal. L. Rev. 263-300 (2009).
-
Afori, Orit Fischman. Implied
license: an emerging new standard in copyright law. 25 Santa Clara
Computer & High Tech. L.J. 275-325 (2009).
-
Bartow, Ann. The true colors
of trademark law: greenlighting a red tide of anti competition blues.
97 Ky. L.J. 263-291 (2008-2009).
-
Beale, Linda M. Tax shelters
and the tax minimization norm: how does the patenting of tax advice
transform the (global) playing field. 9 J. L. Soc’y 29-62 (2008).
-
Citron, Danielle Keats. Cyber
civil rights. 89 B.U. L. Rev. 61-125 (2009).
-
Collins, Kevin Emerson.
Propertizing thought. 60 SMU L. Rev. 317-362 (2007).
-
Einhorn, Michael A. Thinking
outside the box: the next generation moves in the music business. 56
J. Copyright Soc’y U.S.A. 201-211 (2008).
-
Heymann, Laura A. The
trademark/copyright divide. 60 SMU L. Rev. 55-102 (2007).
-
Lemley, Mark A. The
surprising virtues of treating trade secrets as IP rights. 61 Stan. L.
Rev. 311-353 (2008).
-
Lemley, Mark A. and Bhaven
Sampat. Is the Patent Office a rubber stamp? 58 Emory L.J. 181-206
(2008).
-
Merges, Robert P. and Jeffrey
M. Kuhn. An estoppel doctrine for patented standards. 97 Cal. L. Rev.
1-50 (2009).
-
Montagnani, Maria Lillŕ. A
new interface between copyright law and technology: how user-generated
content will shape the future of online distribution. 26 Cardozo Arts &
Ent. L.J. 719-773 (2009).
-
Opderbeck, David W. Patent
damages reform and the shape of patent law. 89 B.U. L. Rev. 127-187
(2009).
-
Ponte, Lucille M. Preserving
creativity from endless digital exploitation: has the time come for the
new concept of copyright dilution? 15 B.U. J. Sci. & Tech. L. 34-101
(2009).
-
Quarmby, Ben. Pirates around
the Second Life islands--why you should monitor the misuse of your
intellectual property in online virtual worlds. 26 Cardozo Arts & Ent.
L.J. 667-694 (2009).
-
Risch, Michael. Everything is
patentable. 75 Tenn. L. Rev. 591-658 (2008).
-
Wong, Mary W. S. Toward an
alternative normative framework for copyright: from private property to
human rights. 26 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J. 775-843 (2009).
February 2009
-
Barrett, Margreth. Finding
trademark use: the historical foundation for limiting infringement
liability to uses “in the manner of a mark”. 43 Wake Forest L. Rev.
893-977 (2008).
-
Beckerman-Rodau, Andrew.
Patents are property: a fundamental but important concept. 4 J. Bus. &
Tech. L. 87-96 (2009).
-
Collins, Kevin Emerson. The
reach of literal claim scope into after-arising technology: on thing
construction and the meaning of meaning. 41 Conn. L. Rev. 493-559
(2008).
-
Durie, Daralyn J. and Mark A.
Lemley. A realistic approach to the obviousness of inventions. 50 Wm.
& Mary L. Rev. 989-1020 (2008).
-
Foley, Thomas B. Show me the
money!: third-party copyright infringement liability reaches investors
& lenders. 38 Sw. L. Rev. 89-139 (2008).
-
Folsom, Thomas C. Space
pirates, hitchhikers, guides, and the public interest: transformational
trademark law in cyberspace. 60 Rutgers L. Rev. 825-918 (2008).
-
The Foulston Siefkin
Lecture. 48 Washburn L.J. 1-132 (2008).
-
Jorda, Karl F. Patent and
trade secret complementariness: an unsuspected synergy. 48 Washburn
L.J. 1-31 (2008).
-
Mazzone, Jason and Matthew
Moore. The secret life of patents. 48 Washburn L.J. 33-65 (2008).
-
Sherwood, Robert M. Trade
secret protection: help for a treacherous journey. 48 Washburn L.J.
67-105 (2008).
-
Henslee, William. Marybeth
Peters is almost right: an alternative to her proposals to reform the
compulsory license scheme for music. 48 Washburn L.J. 107-132 (2008).
-
Harkins, Christopher A.
Tesla, Marconi, and the great radio controversy: awarding patent
damages without chilling a defendant’s incentive to innovate. 73 Mo. L.
Rev. 745-816 (2008).
-
Kahana, Eran, Jonathan T.
Rubens and Kristine F. Dorrain. Survey of the law of cyberspace:
intellectual property cases 2007. 64 Bus. Law. 157-197 (2008).
-
Lipton, Jacqueline D.
Celebrity in cyberspace: a personality rights paradigm for personal
domain name disputes. 65 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1445-1528 (2008).
-
McGeveran, William.
Rethinking trademark fair use. 94 Iowa L. Rev. 49-124 (2008).
-
Morrison, David M.
Bridgeport redux: sampling and audience recoding. 19 Fordham
Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 75-141 (2008).
-
Mtima, Lateef. So dark the
con(tu) of man: the quest for a software derivative work right in
section 117. 70 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 1-100 (2008).
-
Oliar, Dotan and Christopher
Sprigman. There’s no free laugh (anymore): the emergence of
intellectual property norms and the transformation of stand-up comedy.
94 Va. L. Rev. 1787-1867 (2008).
-
Pats, Justin. The show must
go on: an egalitarian approach to descendibility as applied to a
prospective federal personaright statute. 35 N. Ky. L. Rev. 37-52
(2008).
-
Rogoyski, Robert S. Learning
the hard way: the anti-circumvention amendments to the Hong Kong
Copyright Ordinance. 11 Tul. J. Tech. & Intell. Prop. 35-57 (2008).
-
Scafidi, Susan. F.I.T:
fashion as information technology. 59 Syracuse L. Rev. 69-90 (2008).
-
Schultz, Mark F. Live
performance, copyright, and the future of the music business. 43 U.
Rich. L. Rev. 685-764 (2009).
-
Seville, Catherine. Trade
marks. 57 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 955-967 (2008).
-
Sung, Lawrence M. In the wake
of reinvigorated U.S. Supreme Court activity in patent appeals. 4 J.
Bus. & Tech. L. 97-125 (2009).
-
Symposium: Intellectual
Property and Entrepreneurship. 23 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1009-1097 (2008).
-
Burk, Dan L. The role of
patent law in knowledge codification. 23 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1009-1034
(2008).
-
Bagley, Margo A. The need for
speed (and grace): issues in a first-inventor-to-file world. 23
Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1035-1061 (2008).
-
Graham, Stuart J. H. and Ted
Sichelman. Why do start-ups patent? 23 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1063-1097
(2008).
-
Symposium. Publicity Rights
in Bytes: Contemporary Issues in Entertainment and Sports Law. 11
Chapman L. Rev. 423-600 (2008).
-
PANEL 1: Publicity Rights
and the Constitution: Privacy, Publicity, and the YouTube Phenomenon
-
Chemerinsky, Erwin.
Protecting truthful speech: narrowing the tort of public disclosure of
private facts. 11 Chapman L. Rev. 423-434 (2008).
-
Ku, Raymond Shih Ray. Is
nominal use an answer to the free speech and right of publicity
quandary?: lessons from America’s national pastime. 11 Chapman L. Rev.
435-448 (2008).
-
PANEL 2: Publicity Rights
in Entertainment: From Second-Life to the Afterlife
-
Farber, Eric. U-la-la,
what’s happened to our California right of publicity? 11 Chapman L.
Rev. 449-463 (2008).
-
Garon, Jon M. Playing in the
virtual arena: avatars, publicity, and identity reconceptualized
through virtual worlds and computer games. 11 Chapman L. Rev. 465-519
(2008).
-
Greene, K. J. Intellectual
property expansion: the good, the bad, and the right of publicity. 11
Chapman L. Rev. 521-543 (2008).
-
Heller, Kathy. Deciding who
cashes in on the deceased celebrity business. 11 Chapman L. Rev.
545-568 (2008).
-
PANEL 3: Publicity Rights
in Sports: The Fantasy of Player Statistics Ownership
-
Mitten, Matthew J. A triple
play for the public domain: Delaware Lottery to Motorola
to C.B.C. 11 Chapman L. Rev. 569-579 (2008).
-
Weston, Maureen C. The
fantasy of athlete publicity rights: public fascination and fantasy
sports’ assertion of free use place athlete publicity rights on an
uncertain playing field. 11 Chapman L. Rev. 581-600 (2008).
-
Taubman, Antony. Rethinking
TRIPS: ‘adequate remuneration’ for non-voluntary patent licensing. 11
J. Int’l Econ. L. 927-970 (2008).
-
Travis, Hannibal. Opting out
of the Internet in the United States and the European Union: copyright,
safe harbors, and international law. 84 Notre Dame L. Rev. 331-407
(2008).
-
VerSteeg, Russ. Legal
comedy: a study of Terence’s the Phormio. 17 Tul. J. Int’l &
Comp. L. 145-175 (2008).
-
Werbach, Kevin. The
centripetal network: how the Internet holds itself together, and the
forces tearing it apart. 42 UC Davis L. Rev. 343-412 (2008).
January 2009
-
Blackman, Josh. Omniveillance,
Google, privacy in public, and the right to your digital identity: a
tort for recording and disseminating an individual’s image over the
Internet. 49 Santa Clara L. Rev. 313-392 (2009).
-
Bracha, Oren. The ideology of
authorship revisited: authors, markets, and liberal values in early
American copyright. 118 Yale L.J. 186-271 (2008).
-
Brenner, Susan W. Fantasy
crime: the role of criminal law in virtual worlds. 11 Vand. J. Ent. &
Tech. L. 1-97 (2008).
-
Calandrillo, Steve P. and Ewa
M. Davison. The dangers of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act: much
ado about nothing? 50 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 349-415 (2008).
-
Cantrell, Deborah J. Common
ground: the case for collaboration between anti-poverty advocates and
public interest intellectual property advocates. 15 Va. J. Soc. Pol’y &
L. 415-445 (2008).
-
Crouch, Dennis D. The patent
lottery: exploiting behavioral economics for the common good. 16 Geo.
Mason L. Rev. 141-172 (2008).
-
Giblin, Rebecca. A bit
liable? A guide to navigating the U.S. secondary liability patchwork.
25 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L.J. 7-49 (2008).
-
Hagglund, Ryan. Patentability
of human-animal chimeras. 25 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L.J.
51-104 (2008).
-
International and Comparative
Aspects of Trademark Dilution Symposium. 17 Transnat’l L. & Contemp.
Probs. 603-773 (2008).
-
Janis, Mark D. and Peter K.
Yu. Introduction: International and Comparative Aspects of
Trademark Dilution. 17 Transnat’l L. & Contemp. Probs. 603-609
(2008).
-
Gangjee, Dev. The
polymorphism of trademark dilution in India. 17 Transnat’l L. &
Contemp. Probs. 611-630 (2008).
-
Fhima, Ilanah Simon. The fame
standard for trademark dilution in the United States and European Union
compared. 17 Transnat’l L. & Contemp. Probs. 631-666 (2008).
-
Port, Kenneth L. Judging
dilution in the United States and Japan. 17 Transnat’l L. & Contemp.
Probs. 667-687 (2008).
-
Howell, Robert G.
Depreciation of goodwill: a “green light” for dilution from the Supreme
Court of Canada in accommodating infrastructure. 17 Transnat’l L. &
Contemp. Probs. 689-712 (2008).
-
Burrell, Robert and Michael
Handler. Dilution and trademark registration. 17 Transnat’l L. &
Contemp. Probs. 713-755 (2008).
-
Nguyen, Xuan-Thao. The
other famous marks doctrine. 17 Transnat’l L. & Contemp. Probs.
757-773 (2008).
-
Kim, Nancy S. The software
licensing dilemma. 2008 BYU L. Rev. 1103-1164.
-
Nguyen, Xuan-Thao. Justice
Scalia’s “renegade jurisdiction”: lessons for patent law reform. 83
Tul. L. Rev. 111-156 (2008).
-
Perzanowski, Aaron K. The
penumbral public domain: constitutional limits on quasi-copyright
legislation. 10 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 1081-1145 (2008).
-
Schultz, Mark and Alec van
Gelder. Creative development: helping poor countries by building
creative industries. 97 Ky. L.J. 79-148 (2008-2009).
-
Sudarshan, Ranganath.
Nuisance-value patent suits: an economic model and proposal. 25 Santa
Clara Computer & High Tech. L.J. 159-189 (2008).
-
Thomas, Robert E. Debugging
software patents: increasing innovation and reducing uncertainty in the
judicial reform of software patent law. 25 Santa Clara Computer & High
Tech. L.J. 191-241 (2008).
November 2008
-
Bracha, Oren and Frank
Pasquale. Federal search commission? Access, fairness, and
accountability in the law of search. 93 Cornell L. Rev. 1149-1209
(2008).
-
Gómez-Arostegui, H. Tomás.
What history teaches us about copyright injunctions and the
inadequate-remedy-at-law requirement. 81 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1197-1280
(2008).
-
Junger, Peter D. You can’t
patent software: patenting software is wrong. [Manuscript.] 58 Case
W. Res. L. Rev. 333-481 (2008).
-
Klass, Nadine, et al.
Statement of the Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property,
Competition nd Tax Law concerning the Commission’s plans to prolong the
protection period for performing artists and sound recordings. 39 IIC
586-596 (2008).
-
Lastowka, Greg. Google’s
law. 73 Brook. L. Rev. 1327-1410 (2008).
-
Loren, Lydia Pallas. The
Pope’s copyright? Aligning incentives with reality by using
creative motivation to shape copyright protection. 69 La. L. Rev.
1-41 (2008).
-
Osenga, Kristen. Ants,
elephant guns, and statutory subject matter. 39 Ariz. St. L.J.
1087-1126 (2007).
-
Ramsey, Lisa P. Increasing
First Amendment scrutiny of trademark law. 61 SMU L. Rev. 381-458
(2008).
-
Seymore, Sean B.
Heightened enablement in the unpredictable arts. 56 UCLA L. Rev.
127-168 (2008).
-
Stiglitz, Joseph E.
Economic foundations of intellectual property rights. 57 Duke L.J.
1693-1724 (2008).
-
Torrance, Andrew W. Patents
to the rescue--disasters and patent law. 10 DePaul J. Health Care L.
309-358 (2007).
October 2008
-
Bartholomew, Mark. Advertising and the transformation of trademark
law. 38 N.M. L. Rev. 1-48 (2008).
-
Crawford, Susan P. The radio
and the Internet. 23 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 933-1007 (2008).
-
Friedman, David Adam. Free
offers: a new look. 38 N.M. L. Rev. 49-94 (2008).
-
Fukunaga, Yoshifumi.
Enforcing TRIPS: challenges of adjudicating minimum standards
agreements. 23 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 867-931 (2008).
-
Ghosh, Shubha. Decoding and
recoding natural monopoly, deregulation, and intellectual property.
2008 U. Ill. L. Rev. 1125-1184.
-
Irwin, Dana Remus. Paradise
lost in the patent law? Changing visions of technology in the subject
matter inquiry. 60 Fla. L. Rev. 775-823 (2008).
-
Murray, Kali N. The
cooperation of many minds: domestic patent reform in a heterogeneous
regime. 48 IDEA 289-344 (2008).
-
Netanel, Neil Weinstock. New
media in old bottles? Barron’s contextual First Amendment and copyright
in the digital age. 76 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 952-985 (2008)
-
Tushnet, Rebecca. Power
without responsibility: intermediaries and the First Amendment. 76
Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 986-1016 (2008).
-
von Lohmann, Fred. Fair use
as innovation policy. 23 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 829-865 (2008).
September 2008
-
Symposium: Fair Use:
“Incredibly Shrinking” or Extraordinarily Expanding? 31 Colum. J.L. &
Arts 433-635 (2008).
-
Goldstein, Paul. Fair use in
context. 31 Colum. J.L. & Arts 433-443 (2008).
-
Heymann, Laura A. Everything
is transformative: fair use and reader response. 31 Colum. J.L. & Arts
445-466 (2008).
-
Reese, R. Anthony.
Transformativeness and the derivative work right. 31 Colum. J.L. & Arts
467-495 (2008).
-
Tushnet, Rebecca.
User-generated discontent: transformation in practice. 31 Colum. J.L.
& Arts 497-516 (2008).
-
Beebe, Barton. Does judicial
ideology affect copyright fair use outcomes? 31 Colum. J.L. & Arts
517-527 (2008).
-
Kasunic, Robert. Is that all
there is? Reflections on the nature of the second fair use factor. 31
Colum. J.L. & Arts 529-569 (2008).
-
Liu, Joseph P. Two-factor
fair use? 31 Colum. J.L. & Arts 571-585 (2008).
-
Litman, Jessica. Billowing
white goo. 31 Colum. J.L. & Arts 587-601 (2008).
-
Picker, Randal C. Fair use v.
fair access. 31 Colum. J.L. & Arts 603-616 (2008).
-
Wu, Tim. Tolerated use. 31
Colum. J.L. & Arts 617-635 (2008).
-
Cotter, Thomas F. Fair use
and copyright overenforcement. 93 Iowa L. Rev. 1271-1318 (2008).
-
Economides, Nicholas and
William N. Hebert. Patents and antitrust: application to adjacent
markets. 6 J. on Telecomm. & High Tech. L. 455-481 (2008).
-
Gitter, Donna M. Innovators
and imitators: an analysis of proposed legislation implementing an
abbreviated approval pathway for follow-on biologics in the United
States. 35 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 555-625 (2008).
-
Isaacs, Davida H. Shifting
constitutional sands: can and should patentholders rely on the Due
Process Clause to thwart government action? 35 Fla. St. U. L. Rev.
627-667 (2008).
-
Kesan, Jay P. and Andres A.
Gallo. Pondering the politics of private procedures: the case of ICANN.
4 I/S 345-409 (2008).
August 2008
-
Abramowicz, Michael and John
F. Duffy. Intellectual property for market experimentation. 83 N.Y.U.
L. Rev. 337-410 (2008).
-
Abdel-khalik, Jasmine. Is a
rose by any other image still a rose? Disconnecting dilution’s
similarity test from traditional trademark concepts. 39 U. Tol. L. Rev.
591-631 (2008).
-
Appel, Peter A. and T. Rick
Irvin. Changing intellectual property and corporate legal structures to
promote the U.S. environmental management and technology systems
industry. 35 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 397-418 (2008).
-
Barnes, David W.
Misappropriation of trademark. 9 N.C. J.L. & Tech. 171-186 (2008).
-
Bartow, Ann. Pornography,
coercion, and copyright law 2.0. 10 Vand. J. Ent. & Tech. L. 799-840
(2008).
-
Bell, Tom W. The specter of
copyism v. blockheaded authors: how user-generated content affects
copyright policy. 10 Vand. J. Ent. & Tech. L. 841-861 (2008).
-
Besek, June M. and Philippa S.
Loengard. Maintaining the integrity of digital archives. 31 Colum. J.L.
& Arts 267-353 (2008).
-
Bohannan, Christina.
Copyright harm, foreseeability, and fair use. 85 Wash. U. L.R. 969-1031
(2007).
-
Cotter, Thomas F. Toward a
functional definition of publication in copyright law. 92 Minn. L. Rev.
1724-1795 (2008).
-
Golden, John M. Construing
patent claims according to their “interpretive community”: a call for
an attorney-plus-artisan perspective. 21 Harv. J.L. & Tech. 321-386
(2008).
-
Hahn, Robert W. and Hal J.
Singer. Assessing bias in patent infringement cases: a review of
International Trade Commission decisions. 21 Harv. J.L. & Tech. 457-508
(2008).
-
Hetcher, Steven.
User-generated content and the future of copyright: part
one--investiture of ownership. 10 Vand. J. Ent. & Tech. L. 863-892
(2008).
-
Karjala, Dennis S. Copyright
and creativity. 15 UCLA Ent. L. Rev. 169-201 (2008).
-
Kim, Nancy S. Clicking and
cringing. 86 Or. L. Rev. 797-863 (2007).
-
Kwall, Roberta Rosenthal. The
author as steward “for limited times”. (Reviewing Lior Zemer,
The
Idea of Authorship in Copyright.) 88 B.U. L. Rev. 685-708 (2008).
-
Lastowka, Greg.
User-generated content and virtual worlds. 10 Vand. J. Ent. & Tech. L.
893-917 (2008).
-
Lipton, Jacqueline D. A
winning solution for YouTube and Utube? Corresponding trademarks and
domain name sharing. 21 Harv. J.L. & Tech. 509-545 (2008).
-
Lunney, Glynn S., Jr.
Copyright’s price discrimination panacea. 21 Harv. J.L. & Tech. 387-456
(2008).
-
McJohn, Stephen M. Patents:
hiding from history. 24 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L.J. 961-980
(2008).
-
Mehra, Salil K. The iPod
tax: why the digital copyright system of American law professors’
dreams failed in Japan. 79 U. Colo. L. Rev. 421-465 (2008).
-
Reidenberg, Joel. Fourth
Annual Baker Botts Lecture. The rule of intellectual property law
in the Internet economy. 44 Hous. L. Rev. 1073-1095 (2007).
-
Strandburg, Katherine J.
Freedom of association in a networked world: First Amendment regulation
of relational surveillance. 49 B.C. L. Rev. 741-821 (2008).
-
Strandburg, Katherine J.
Users as innovators: implications for patent doctrine. 79 U. Colo. L.
Rev. 467-544 (2008)
-
Weiser, Philip J. The next
frontier for network neutrality. 60 Admin. L. Rev. 273-322 (2008).
-
Symposium: Intellectual
Property, Trade and Development: Accommodating and Reconciling
Different National Levels of Protection. 82 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev.
1109-1626 (2007).
-
I. Access to Information:
Database Protection. 82 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 1109-1178 (2007).
-
Gervais, Daniel J. The
protection of databases. 82 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 1109-1168 (2007).
-
Ginsburg, Jane C. A marriage
of convenience? A comment on The protection of databases. 82
Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 1171-1178 (2007).
-
II. Different Layers of
Lawmaking: National, Regional, and International. 82 Chi.-Kent. L.
Rev. 1181-1250 (2007).
-
Bently, Lionel. Copyright,
translations, and relations between Britain and India in the nineteenth
and early twentieth centuries. 82 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 1181-1240 (2007).
-
Dreyfuss, Rochelle C.
Creative lawmaking: a comment on Lionel Bently, Copyright,
translations, and relations between Britain and India in the nineteenth
and early twentieth centuries. 82 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 1243-1250
(2007).
-
III. Geographic Indications
and Trademarks. 82 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 1253-1365 (2007).
-
Gangjee, Dev. Quibbling
siblings: conflicts between trademarks and geographical indications.
82 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 1253-1291 (2007).
-
Cotton, Amy P. 123 years at
the negotiating table and still no dessert? The case in support of
TRIPS geographical indication protections. 82 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev.
1295-1316 (2007).
-
Kur, Annette. Quibbling
siblings--comments to Dev Gangjee’s presentation. 82 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev.
1317-1327 (2007).
-
Okediji, Ruth L. The
international intellectual property roots of geographical indications.
82 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 1329-1365 (2007.
-
IV. The Role of Industry and
Nongovernmental Organizations.
-
Matthews, Duncan. The role of
international NGOs in the intellectual property policy-making and
norm-setting activities of multilateral institutions. 82 Chi.-Kent. L.
Rev. 1369-1387 (2007).
-
V. The Role of Contracts and
Private Initiatives. 82 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 1391-1442 (2007).
-
Dusollier, Séverine. Sharing
access to intellectual property through private ordering. 82 Chi.-Kent.
L. Rev. 1391-1435 (2007).
-
Rai, Arti K. “Open source”
and private ordering: a commentary on Dusollier. 82 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev.
1439-1442 (2007).
-
VI. The Policy-Making
Dynamics in Intergovernmental Organizations. 82 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev.
1445-1466 (2007).
-
Yu, Geoffrey. The structure
and process of negotiations at the World Intellectual Property
Organization. 82 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 1445-1453 (2007).
-
Visser, Coenraad. The
Policy-Making Dynamics in Intergovernmental Organizations: a
comment on the remarks of Geoffrey Yu. 82 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 1457-1466
(2007).
-
VII. Access to Essential
Medicines. 82 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 1469-1554 (2007).
-
Ho, Cynthia M. A new world
order for addressing patent rights and public health. 82 Chi.-Kent. L.
Rev. 1469-1515 (2007).
-
Love, James and Tim Hubbard.
The big idea: prizes to stimulate R&D for new medicines. 82 Chi.-Kent.
L. Rev. 1519-1554 (2007).
-
VIII. The Protection of
Rights in Plant Varieties. 82 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 1557-1626 (2007).
-
Janis, Mark D. and Stephen
Smith. Technological change and the design of plant variety protection
regimes. 82 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 1557-1615 (2007).
-
Helfer, Laurence R. The
demise and rebirth of plant variety protection: a comment on Technological change and the design of plant variety protection regimes.
82 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 1619-1626 (2007).
-
Copyright in Context:
Institute for Intellectual Property & Information Law Symposium. 44
Hous. L. Rev. 815-1071 (2007).
-
Joyce, Craig. Introduction.
44 Hous. L. Rev. 815-830 (2007).
-
Netanel, Neil Weinstock.
Maharam of Padua v. Giustiniani: the sixteenth-century origins of
the Jewish law of copyright. 44 Hous. L. Rev. 821-870 (2007).
-
Kwall, Roberta Rosenthal.
Originality in context. 44 Hous. L. Rev. 871-899 (2007).
-
Cotter, Thomas F. Misuse. 44
Hous. L. Rev. 901-964 (2007).
-
Aoki, Keith. Balancing act:
reflections on Justice O’Connor’s intellectual property jurisprudence.
44 Hous. L. Rev. 965-1011 (2007).
-
Menell, Peter S. Knowledge
accessibility and preservation policy for the digital age. 44 Hous. L.
Rev. 1013-1071 (2007).
-
Teaching Intellectual Property
Law. 52 St. Louis U. L.J. 715-950 (2008).
-
Bartow,
Ann. When bias is bipartisan: teaching about the democratic process
in an intellectual property law republic. 52 St. Louis U. L.J. 715-733
(2008).
-
Farley, Christine Haight,
Peter Jaszi, Victoria Phillips, Joshua Sarnoff and Ann Shalleck.
Clinical legal education and the public interest in intellectual
property law. 52 St. Louis U. L.J. 735-748 (2008).
-
Goldman, Eric. Teaching
cyberlaw. 52 St. Louis U. L.J. 749-763 (2008).
-
Greene, K. J. “There’s no
business like show business”: using multimedia materials to teach
entertainment law. 52 St. Louis U. L.J. 765-780 (2008).
-
Heymann, Laura A. The
reasonable person in trademark law. 52 St. Louis U. L.J. 781-793
(2008).
-
Holbrook, Timothy R. Patents
for poets. 52 St. Louis U. L.J. 795-812 (2008).
-
Kwall, Roberta Rosenthal.
Teaching an intellectual property seminar through the legal literature.
52 St. Louis U. L.J. 813-821 (2008).
-
Madison, Michael J. Writing
to learn law and writing in law: an intellectual property
illustration. 52 St. Louis U. L.J. 823-841 (2008).
-
McKenna, Mark P. Teaching
trademark theory through the lens of distinctiveness. 52 St. Louis U.
L.J. 843-853 (2008).
-
McManis, Charles R. Teaching
current trends and future developments in intellectual property. 52 St.
Louis U. L.J. 855-875 (2008).
-
O’Connor, Sean M. Teaching IP
from an entrepreneurial counseling and transactional perspective. 52
St. Louis U. L.J. 877-891 (2008).
-
Tushnet, Rebecca. Sight,
sound, and meaning: teaching intellectual property with audiovisual
materials. 52 St. Louis U. L.J. 891-904 (2008).
-
Welkowitz, David S. and Tyler
T. Ochoa. Teaching rights of publicity: blending copyright and
trademark, common law and statutes, and domestic and foreign law. 52
St. Louis U. L.J. 905-921 (2008).
-
Yu, Peter K. Teaching
international intellectual property law. 52 St. Louis U. L.J. 923-950
(2008).
-
2008 Santa Clara Computer &
High Technology Law Journal Symposium. 24 Santa Clara Computer & High
Tech. L.J. 715-960 (2008).
-
Boone,
M. Scott. Virtual property and personhood. 24 Santa Clara Computer &
High Tech. L.J. 715-747 (2008).
-
Dougherty, Candidus and Greg
Lastowka. Virtual trademarks. 24 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L.J.
749-828 (2008).
-
Hetcher, Steven.
User-generated content and the future of copyright: part
two--agreements between users and mega-sites. 24 Santa Clara Computer &
High Tech. L.J. 829-867 (2008).
-
Meeker, Heather. Outsource
software development and open source: coming of age in the 2000s. 24
Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L.J. 869-881 (2008).
-
Post, David G. Governing
cyberspace: law. 24 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L.J. 883-913
(2008).
-
Gard, Elizabeth Townsend and
Rachel Goda. The Fizzy Experiment: Second Life, virtual
property and a 1L property course. 24 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech.
L.J. 915-960 (2008).
-
McJohn, Stephen M. Patents:
hiding from history. 24 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L.J. 961-980
(2008).
-
What Ifs and Other Alternative
Intellectual Property and Cyberlaw Stories. 2008 Mich. St. L. Rev.
1-433.
-
Yu, Peter K. What Ifs and
Other Alternative Intellectual Property and Cyberlaw Stories:
foreword. 2008 Mich. St. L. Rev. 1-7.
-
Saunders, Kevin W. What if
every “if only” statement were true?: the logic of counterfactuals.
2008 Mich. St. L. Rev. 9-17.
-
Lemley, Mark A. Ignoring
patents. 2008 Mich. St. L. Rev. 19-34.
-
Gajda, Amy. What if Samuel D.
Warren hadn’t married a senator’s daughter?: uncovering the press
coverage that led to “the right to privacy”. 2008 Mich. St. L. Rev.
35-60.
-
Preston, Cheryl B. The
Internet and pornography: what if Congress and the Supreme Court had
been comprised of techies in 1995-1997? 2008 Mich. St. L. Rev. 61-102.
-
Garon, Jon M. What if DMR
fails?: seeking patronage in the iWasteland and the Virtual O. 2008
Mich. St. L. Rev. 103-151.
-
Landau, Michael. What if the
anti-bootlegging statutes are upheld under the Commerce Clause? 2008
Mich. St. L. Rev. 153-172.
-
Corbett, Susan. What if
object code had been excluded from protection as a literary work in
copyright law? A New Zealand perspective. 2008 Mich. St. L. Rev.
173-197.
-
Drassinower, Abraham.
Authorship as public address: on the specificity of copyright vis-ŕ-vis
patent and trade-mark. 2008 Mich. St. L. Rev. 199-232.
-
Tussey, Deborah. What if
employees owned their copyrights? 2008 Mich. St. L. Rev. 233-244.
-
Strandburg, Katherine J. What
if there were a business method use exemption to patent infringement?
2008 Mich. St. L. Rev. 245-278.
-
Vetter, Greg R. Claiming
copyleft in open source software: what if the Free Software
Foundation’s General Public License (GPL) had been patented? 2008 Mich.
St. L. Rev. 279-319.
-
Winston, Elizabeth I. What if
seeds were not patentable? 2008 Mich. St. L. Rev. 321-344.
-
Calboli, Irene. What if,
after all, trademarks were “traded in gross”? 2008 Mich. St. L. Rev.
345-366.
-
Cross, John T. The lingering
legacy of Trade-mark Cases. 2008 Mich. St. L. Rev. 367-388.
-
Bowal, Peter and Christopher
Bowal. What if…the stud does not function? 2008 Mich. St. L. Rev.
389-399.
-
O’Melinn, Liam Séamus. What
if James Madison were to assess the intellectual property revolution?
2008 Mich. St. L. Rev. 401-412.
-
Boone, M. Scott. The past,
present, and future of computing and its impact on digital rights
management. 2008 Mich. St. L. Rev. 413-433.
-
Business Law Forum.
Nonobviousness--The Shape of Things to Come. 12 Lewis & Clark L. Rev.
323-598 (2008).
-
Mandel, Gregory N. Another
missed opportunity: the Supreme Court’s failure to define
nonobviousness or combat hindsight bias in KSR v. Teleflex. 12
Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 323-342 (2008).
-
Duffy, John F. A timing
approach to patentability. 12 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 343-374 (2008).
-
Eisenberg, Rebecca S.
Pharma’s nonobvious problem. 12 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 375-430 (2008).
-
Dreyfuss, Rochelle Cooper.
Nonobviousness: a comment on three learned papers. 12 Lewis & Clark L.
Rev. 431-441 (2008).
-
Denicolň, Vincenzo. Economic
theories of the nonobviousness requirement for patentability: a
survey. 12 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 443-459 (2008).
-
Sawyer, R. Keith. Creativity,
innovation, and obviousness. 12 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 461-487 (2008).
-
Seifert, Colleen M. Now why
didn’t I think of that? The cognitive processes that create the
obvious. 12 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 489-507 (2008).
-
Smith, Steven M. Invisible
assumptions and the unintentional use of knowledge and experiences in
creative cognition. 12 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 509-525 (2008).
-
Davidson, Janet and Nicole
Greenberg. Psychologists’ views on nonobviousness: are they obvious?
12 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 527-546 (2008).
-
Meurer, Michael J. and
Katherine J. Strandburg. Patent carrots and sticks: a model of
nonobviousness. 12 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 547-578 (2008).
-
Miller,
Joseph Scott. Level of skill and long-felt need: notes on a forgotten
future. 12 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 579-598 (2008)
July 2008
-
Balganesh, Shyamkrishna. The
social costs of property rights in broadcast (and cable) signals. 22
Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1303-1387 (2007).
-
Bohannan, Christina.
Copyright preemption of contracts. 67 Md. L. Rev. 616-671 (2008).
-
Boone, M. Scott. Ubiquitous
computing, virtual worlds, and the displacement of property rights. 4
I/S 91-156 (2008).
-
Carrier, Michael A. and Greg
Lastowka. Against cyberproperty. 22 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1485-1520
(2007).
-
Devlin, Alan. Revisiting the
presumption of patent validity. 37 Sw. U. L. Rev. 323-369 (2008).
-
Dolak, Lisa A. and Blaine T.
Bettinger. The United States patent system in the media mirror. 58
Syracuse L. Rev. 459-521 (2008).
-
Ghosh, Shubha. Race-specific
patents, commercialization, and intellectual property policy. 56 Buff.
L. Rev. 409-494 (2008).
-
Gibson, Christopher S.
Globalization and the technology standards game: balancing concerns of
protectionism and intellectual property in international standards. 22
Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1403-1484 (2007).
-
Ginsburg, Jane C. Separating
the Sony sheep from the Grokster goats: reckoning the
future business plans of copyright-dependent technology entrepreneurs.
50 Ariz. L. Rev. 577-609 (2008).
-
Greene, K.J. Intellectual
property at the intersection of race and gender: lady sings the blues.
16 Am. U. J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 365-385 (2008).
-
Heald, Paul J. Property
rights and the efficient exploitation of copyrighted works: an
empirical analysis of public domain and copyrighted fiction
bestsellers. 92 Minn. L. Rev. 1031-1063 (2008).
-
Lee, Edward. Freedom of the
press 2.0. 42 Ga. L. Rev. 309-405 (2008).
-
Lemley, Mark A. The limits of
claim differentiation. 22 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1389-1401 (2007).
-
Margolis, Stephen E. The
profits of infringement: Richard Posner v. Learned Hand. 22 Berkeley
Tech. L.J. 1521-1563 (2007).
-
Ng, Alina. Authors and
readers: conceptualizing authorship in copyright law. 30 Hastings
Comm. & Ent. L.J. 377-417 (2008).
-
Port, Kenneth L. Trademark
extortion: the end of trademark law. 65 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 585-635
(2008).
-
Prinz zu Waldeck und Pyrmont,
Wolrad. Research tool patents after Integra v. Merck--have they
reached a safe harbor? 14 Mich. Telecomm. & Tech. L. Rev. 367-446
(2008).
-
Stanley, Jeremy. Managing
digital rights management: effectively protecting intellectual property
and consumer rights in the wake of the Sony CD copy protection scandal.
4 I/S 157-202 (2008).
-
Symposium: The Future of
Patent Reform. 4 I/S 1-87 (2008).
-
Lee, Edward. Introduction:
The Future of Patent Reform. 4 I/S 1-9 (2008).
-
Collins, Kevin Emerson.
Claims to information qua information and a structural theory of
Section 101. 4 I/S 11-29 (2008).
-
Wong, Christopher. Community
service: adapting peer review to the patenting process. 4 I/S 31-56
(2008).
-
Jaffe, Adam B. Patent
reform: no time like the present. 4 I/S 59-73 (2008).
-
Hosie, Spencer. Patent trolls
and the new tort reform: a practitioner’s perspective. 4 I/S 75-87
(2008).
-
Intellectual Property Law for
the Global Marketplace. 23 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 709-935 (2007).
-
Yu, Peter K. Ten common
questions about intellectual property and human rights. 23 Ga. St. U.
L. Rev. 709-753 (2007).
-
Pager, Sean A. Patents on a
shoestring: making patent protection work for developing countries. 23
Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 755-808 (2007).
-
Deazley, Ronan. The life of
an author: Samuel Egerton Brydges and the Copyright Act 1814.
23 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 809-846 (2007).
-
Landau, Michael. Fitting
United States copyright law into the international scheme: foreign and
domestic challenges to recent legislation. 23 Ga. St. U. L. Rev.
847-892 (2007).
-
Sanders, Anselm Kamperman.
Intellectual property, free trade agreements and economic development.
23 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 893-911 (2007).
-
Brunn, Niklas. Innovation
policy, academia and intellectual property rights. 23 Ga. St. U. L.
Rev. 913-935 (2007).
-
Symposium. Creators vs.
Consumers: The Rhetoric, Reality and Reformation of Intellectual
Property Law and Policy. 58 Syracuse L. Rev. 427-546 (2008).
-
Bybee, Keith James.
Introduction. 58 Syracuse L. Rev. 427-430 (2008).
-
Greene, K. J. Trademark law
and racial subordination: from marketing of stereotypes to norms of
authorship. 58 Syracuse L. Rev. 431-445 (2008).
-
Stimson, David C. The empire
strikes back--a corporate trademark owner responds to Professor Greene.
58 Syracuse L. Rev. 447-457 (2008).
-
Dolak, Lisa A. and Blaine T.
Bettinger. The United States patent system in the media mirror. 58
Syracuse L. Rev. 459-521 (2008).
-
Bell, Tom W. Copyright as
intellectual property privilege. 58 Syracuse L. Rev. 523-546
(2008)
-
Werbach, Kevin. Only
connect. 22 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1233-1301 (2007).
|
Blogs featuring IP Section Members
Info/Law
43(b)log
Technology and Marketing Law Blog
Lessig.org
scrawford.net
discourse.net
madisonian.net
Sivacracy
Carrollogos
Legal Theory Blog
Antitrust and
Competition Policy Blog
Holman's Biotech IP Blog
Patently-O

Email lists of interest to IP
Section Members
IPProfs (contact
Tom Field, Franklin
Pierce Law Center)
Cyberprof
(contact Mark
Lemley, Stanford University)
IPandBiotech
(contact Robin Feldman, UC
Hastings) |