Intellectual Property Law Section Association of American Law Schools

The Intellectual Property Law Section of the Association of American Law Schools was organized to facilitate the study of intellectual property in American law schools and to provide a forum for law faculty members engaged in the teaching of intellectual property and related subjects to exchange ideas.

Section Program at 2009 AALS Annual Meeting

[Coming Soon]

News

Scholarship

[the entries below are obtained via the electronic version of the Current Index to Legal Periodicals; beginning with February 2007, the dates indicated correspond to the publication date of the CILP]

June 2008

Bambauer, Derek E. Faulty math: the economics of legalizing The Grey Album. 59 Ala. L. Rev. 345-407 (2008).
Cross, John T. and Peter K. Yu. Competition law and copyright misuse. 56 Drake L. Rev. 427-462 (2008).
Dickman, Joshua M. Anonymity and the demands of civil procedure in music downloading lawsuits. 82 Tul. L. Rev. 1049-1118 (2008).
Weiser, Philip J. and Dale Hatfield. Spectrum policy reform and the next frontier of property rights. 15 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 549-609 (2008).

May 2008

Argento, Zoe. Applying genericide to the right of publicity. 10 Vand. J. Ent. & Tech. L. 321-362 (2008).
Austin, Graeme W. Tolerating confusion about confusion: trademark policies and fair use. 50 Ariz. L. Rev. 157-189 (2008).
Burk, Dan L. The mereology of digital copyright. 18 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 711-739 (2008).
Chickos, Sarah J. Navigating the safe harbor: guidance from the courts on qualifying for the 35 U.S.C. 271(e)(1) exemption from patent infringement of health care related inventions. 24 J. Contemp. Health L. & Pol’y 43-68 (2007).
de la Durantaye, Katharina. The origins of the protection of literary authorship in ancient Rome. 25 B.U. Int’l L.J. 37-111 (2007).
Drennan, William A. The Patent Office is promoting shocking new tax loopholes--should the empire strike back? 60 Okla. L. Rev. 491-546 (2007).
The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy. Intellectual Property: Does IP Harm or Help Developing Countries? [Transcript.] Bruce A. Lehman, panel moderator; Alex M. Azar II, Graeme B. Dinwoodie, Jerome H. Reichman and Robert Sherwood, panelists. 2007 U. Ill. J.L. Tech. & Pol’y 65-87.
Frieden, Rob. Internet packet sniffing and its impact on the network neutrality debate and the balance of power between intellectual property creators and consumers. 18 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 633-675 (2008).
Frischmann, Brett and Spencer Weber Waller. Revitalizing essential facilities. 75 Antitrust L.J. 1-65 (2008).
Goswami, Ruchira and Karubakee Nandi. Naming the unnamed: intellectual property rights of women artists from India. 16 Am. U. J. Gender, Soc. Pol’y & L. 257-281 (2007).
Grynberg, Michael. Trademark litigation as consumer conflict. 83 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 60-119 (2008).
Harris, H. Stephen, Jr. and Rodney J. Ganske. The monopolization and IP abuse provisions of China’s Anti-Monopoly Law: concerns and a proposal. 75 Antitrust L.J. 213-229 (2008).
Holderman, Judge James F. and Halley Guren. The patent litigation predicament in the United States. 2007 U. Ill. J.L. Tech. & Pol’y 1-20.
Kapczynski, Amy. The access to knowledge mobilization and the new politics of intellectual property. 117 Yale L.J. 804-885 (2008).
Lee, Peter. The evolution of intellectual infrastructure. 83 Wash. L. Rev. 39-122 (2008).
Lee, Thomas R., Glenn L. Christensen and Eric D. DeRosia. Trademarks, consumer psychology, and the sophisticated consumer. 57 Emory L.J. 575-650 (2008).
Lemley, Mark A. Are universities patent trolls? 18 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 611-632 (2008).
Lincoff, Bennett. Common sense, accommodation and sound policy for the digital music marketplace. 2 J. Int’l Media & Ent. L. 1-64 (2008).
Madison, Michael J. Intellectual property and Americana, or why IP gets the blues. 18 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 677-710 (2008).
Miller, Matthew S. Piracy in our own backyard: a comparative analysis of the implications of fashion copying in the United States for the international copyright community. 2 J. Int’l Media & Ent. L. 133-157 (2008).
Orbach, Barak Y. Indirect free riding on the wheels of commerce: dual-use technologies and copyright liability. 57 Emory L.J. 409-461 (2008).
Schwabach, Aaron. Intellectual property piracy: perception and reality in China, the United States and elsewhere. 2 J. Int’l Media & Ent. L. 65-83 (2008).
Symposium. Proteins, Patents and Progress: The Interface of Bio-Technology and Intellectual Property Law. 76 UMKC L. Rev. 295-551 (2007).

Holman, Christopher M. The impact of human gene patents on innovation and access: a survey of human gene patent litigation. 76 UMKC L. Rev. 295-361 (2007)

Torrance, Andrew W. Metaphysics and patenting life. 76 UMKC L. Rev. 363-403 (2007).

Maurer, Stephen M. Open source drug discovery: finding a niche (maybe several). 76 UMKC L. Rev. 405-435 (2007).

Meuller, Janice M. Biotechnology patenting in India: will bio-generics lead a “sunrise industry” to bio-innovation? 76 UMKC L. Rev. 437-490 (2007).

Schuster, Martina I. Sufficient disclosure in Europe: is there a separate written description doctrine under the European Patent Convention? 76 UMKC L. Rev. 491-504 (2007).

Cromer, Julie D. It’s hard to find a good pair of genes: so why make them free for the taking? 76 UMKC L. Rev. 505-523 (2007).

Mireles, Michael S. The Bayh-Dole Act and incentives for the commercialization of government-funded invention in developing countries. 76 UMKC L. Rev. 525-551 (2007).

Van Houweling, Molly Shaffer. The new servitudes. 96 Geo. L.J. 885-950 (2008).
Wanat, Daniel E. Copyright infringement litigation and the exercise of personal jurisdiction within due process limits: judicial application of purposeful availment, purposeful direction, or purposeful effects requirements to finding that a plaintiff has established a defendant’s minimum contacts within the forum state. 59 Mercer L. Rev. 553-593 (2008).
Zarsky, Tal Z. Law and online social networks: mapping the challenges and promises of user-generated information flows. 18 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 741-783 (2008).

April 2008

Barten, Garrett. Permanent injunctions: a discretionary remedy for patent infringement in the aftermath of the Ebay decision. 15 U. Miami Bus. L. Rev. 1-22 (2007).
Beebe, Barton. An empirical study of U.S. copyright fair use opinions, 1978-2005. 156 U. Pa. L. Rev. 549-624 (2008).
Devlin, Alan. Exclusionary strategies in the Hatch-Waxman context. 2007 Mich. St. L. Rev. 631-681.
Einhorn, Michael A. Gorillas in our midst: searching for King Kong in the music jungle. 55 J. Copyright Soc’y U.S.A. 145-164 (2008).
Franks, Vicki M. The legal landscape of subject-matter jurisdiction, individual patent claims, and stipulations or covenants not to sue: do we need to stop and ask for directions? 12 J. Tech. L. & Pol’y 149-178 (2007).
Green, Daniel Austin. Gulliver’s trials: a modest proposal to excuse and justify satire. 11 Chapman L. Rev. 183-211 (2007).
Gulbrandsen, Carl E. The Kastenmeier Lecture. Bayh-Dole: Wisconsin roots and inspired public policy. 2007 Wis. L. Rev. 1149-1163.
Halaby, Andrew F. “The trickiest problem with functionality” revisited: a new datum prompts a thought experiment. 63 N.Y.U. Ann. Surv. Am. L. 151-190 (2007).
Khanijou, Siddharth. Patent inequity?: rethinking the application of strict liability to patent law in the nanotechnology era. 12 J. Tech. L. & Pol’y 179-223 (2007).
Matwyshyn, Andrea M. Technoconsen(t)sus. 85 Wash. U. L.Rev. 529-574 (2007).
Quiggin, John and Dan Hunter. Money ruins everything. 30 Hastings Comm. & Ent. L.J. 203-255 (2008).
Rothchild, John A. The social costs of technological protection measures. 34 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 1181-1220 (2007).
Sarnoff, Joshua D. Bilcare, KSR, presumptions of validity, preliminary relief, and obviousness in patent law. 25 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J. 995-1057 (2008).
Schwender, Danwill. Promotion of the arts: an argument for limited copyright protection of illegal graffiti. 55 J. Copyright Soc’y U.S.A. 257-282 (2008).
Sidak, J. Gregory. Holdup, royalty stacking, and the presumption of injunctive relief for patent infringement: a reply to Lemley and Shapiro. 92 Minn. L. Rev. 714-748 (2008).
Stadler, Sara K. Performance values. 83 Notre Dame L. Rev. 697-759 (2008).
Tan, David. Beyond trademark law: what the right of publicity can learn from cultural studies. 25 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J. 913-994 (2008).
Tschura, Gerald T. Likelihood of confusion and expressive functionality: a fresh look at the ornamental use of institutional colors, names and emblems on apparel and other goods. 53 Wayne L. Rev. 873-897 (2007).
Treiger-Bar-Am, Kim. Kant on copyright: rights of transformative authorship. 25 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J. 1059-1103 (2008).
Wojcik, Mary Campbell. The antithesis of originality: Bridgeman, image licensors, and the public domain. 30 Hastings Comm. & Ent. L.J. 257-286 (2008).

March 2008

Abramowicz, Michael. The uneasy case for patent races over auctions. 60 Stan. L. Rev. 803-862 (2007).
Allison, John R. and Ronald J. Mann. The disputed quality of software patents. 85 Wash. U. L.Rev. 297-342 (2007).
Anderson, Bradford P. Complete harmony or mere détente? Shielding California employees from non-competition covenants while simultaneously protecting employer trade secrets. 8 U.C. Davis Bus. L.J. 8-34 (2007).
Ayres, Ian and Gideon Parchomovsky. Tradable patent rights. 60 Stan. L. Rev. 863-894 (2007).
Band, Jonathan. Google and fair use. 3 J. Bus. & Tech. L. 1-28 (2008).
Blair-Stanek, Andrew. Profits as commercial success. 117 Yale L.J. 642-679 (2008).
Buckley, Branwen. SueTube: Web 2.0 and copyright infringement. 31 Colum. J.L. & Arts 235-265 (2008).
Denicola, Robert C. Access controls, rights protection, and circumvention: interpreting the Digital Millennium Copyright Act to preserve noninfringing use. 31 Colum. J.L. & Arts 209-233 (2008).
Dorrain, Kristine F. and John E. Ottaviani. Survey of the law of cyberspace: intellectual property cases 2006. 63 Bus. Law. 271-300 (2007).
Dubinsky, Igor. The race to the box office leads to cinematic déjà vu: modifying copyright law to minimize rent dissipation and copyright redundancy at the movies. 29 Whittier L. Rev. 405-469 (2007).
Dwyer, Lorna. Patent protection and access to medicine: the Colombian and Peruvian trade promotion agreements. 13 Law & Bus. Rev. Am. 825-857 (2007).
Gould, Daniel. Time’s up: copyright termination, work-for-hire and the recording industry. 31 Colum. J.L. & Arts 91-137 (2007).
Hagglund, Ryan. Patentability of cloned extinct animals. 15 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 381-446 (2008).
Halbert, Debora J. The World Intellectual Property Organization: past, present and future. 54 J. Copyright Soc’y U.S.A. 253-284 (2007).
Klemens, Ben. The rise of the information processing patent. 14 B.U. J. Sci. & Tech. L. 1-38 (2008).
Lipton, Jacqueline D. Who owns “Hillary.com”? Political speech and the First Amendment in cyberspace. 49 B.C.L. Rev. 55-123 (2008).
Mtima, Lateef. So dark the CON(TU) of man: the quest for a software derivative work right in section 117. 69 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 23-122 (2007).
Mueller, Janice M. The tiger awakens: the tumultuous transformation of India’s patent system and the rise of Indian pharmaceutical innovation. 68 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 491-641 (2007).
Parker, Carol A. Institutional repositories and the principle of open access: changing the way we think about legal scholarship. 37 N.M. L. Rev. 431-477 (2007).
Prettyman, Gerald R., Jr. The “evolving written description doctrine” and the search for specificity (a.k.a. adequacy id the matter of invention). 1 J. Bus. Entrepreneurship & L. 1-42 (2007).
Raymond, James E. Software licenses, source code escrows, and trustee powers under 11 U.S.C. § 365. 1 J. Bus. Entrepreneurship & L. 43-66 (2007).
Silbey, Jessica. The mythical beginnings of intellectual property. 15 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 319-379 (2008).
Stauffer, Zahr Said. ‘Po-mo karaoke’ or postcolonial pastiche? What fair use analysis could draw from literary criticism. 31 Colum. J.L. & Arts 43-90 (2007).
Tushnet, Rebecca. Gone in sixty milliseconds: trademark law and cognitive science. 86 Tex. L. Rev. 507-568 (2008).
VerSteeg, Russ. Viacom v. YouTube: preliminary observations. 9 N.C. J.L. & Tech. 43-67 (2007).
Wilf, Steven. The making of the post-war paradigm in American intellectual property law. 31 Colum. J.L. & Arts 139-207 (2008).

February 2008

Abbott, Frederick M. and Jerome H. Reichman. The Doha Round’s public health legacy: strategies for the production and diffusion of patented medicines under the amended TRIPS provisions. 10 J. Int’l Econ. L. 921-987 (2007).
Arewa, Olufunmilayo B. The freedom to copy: copyright, creation, and context. 41 UC Davis L. Rev. 477-558 (2007).
Barry, Jordan. When second comes first: correcting patent’s poor secondary incentives through an optional patent purchase system. 2007 Wis. L. Rev. 585-648.
Bauer, Joseph P. Addressing the incoherency of the preemption provision of the Copyright Act of 1976. 10 Vand. J. Ent. & Tech. L. 1-119 (2007).
Calboli, Irene. The sunset of “quality control” in modern trademark licensing. 57 Am. U. L. Rev. 341-407 (2007).
Chiang, Tun-Jen. A cost-benefit approach to patent obviousness. 82 St. John’s L. Rev. 39-105 (2008).
Collins, Kevin Emerson. Constructive nonvolition in patent law and the problem of insufficient thought control. 2007 Wis. L. Rev. 759-826.
Crawford, Susan P. The Internet and the project of communications law. 55 UCLA L. Rev. 359-407 (2007).
Czapracka, Katarzyna A. Antitrust and trade secrets: the U.S. and the EU approach. 24 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L.J. 207-273 (2008.
Desai, Anuj C. Wiretapping before the wires: the post office and the birth of communications privacy. 60 Stan. L. Rev. 553-594 (2007).
Durham, Alan L. Patent symmetry. 87 B.U. L. Rev. 969-1019 (2007).
Farrell, Joseph, et al. Standard setting, patents, and hold-up. 74 Antitrust L.J. 603-670 (2007).
Galbraith, Christine D. A panoptic approach to information policy: utilizing a more balanced theory of property in order to ensure the existence of a prodigious public domain. 15 J. Intell. Prop. L. 1-38 (2007).
Graves, Charles Tait. Trade secrets as property: theory and consequences. 15 J. Intell. Prop. L. 39-89 (2007).
Grimmelmann, James. The structure of search engine law. 93 Iowa L. Rev. 1-63 (2007).
Helfer, Laurence R. The new innovation frontier? Intellectual property and the European Court of Human Rights. 49 Harv. Int’l L.J. 1-52 (2008).
Hughes, Justin. Created facts and the flawed ontology of copyright law. 83 Notre Dame L. Rev. 43-108 (2007).
Katz, Ariel. Making sense of nonsense: intellectual property, antitrust, and market power. 49 Ariz. L. Rev. 837-909 (2007).
Laakmann, Anna Bartow. Restoring the genetic commons: a “common sense: approach to biotechnology patents in the wake of KSR v. Teleflex. 14 Mich. Telecomm. & Tech. L. Rev. 43-76 (2007).
Landes, William M. Posner on Beanie Babies. 74 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1761-1778 (2007).
Layne-Farrar, Anne, A. Jorge Padilla and Richard Schmalensee. Pricing patents for licensing in standard-setting organizations: making sense of FRAND commitments. 74 Antitrust L.J. 671-703 (2007).
Lemley, Mark A. Rationalizing Internet safe harbors. 6 J. on Telecomm. & High Tech. L. 101-119 (2007).
Long, Doris E. Messages from the front: hard earned lessons on information security from the IP wars 16 Mich. St. J. Int’l L. 71-111 (2007).
Lüder, Tilman. The next ten years in E.U. copyright: making markets work. 18 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 1-60 (2007).
McGarrigle, Philip and Vern Norviel. Laws of nature and the business of biotechnology. 24 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L.J. 275-334 (2008).
Miao, Felix. Protection of intellectual property rights in software products and how to accomplish a technology transfer transaction in China. 18 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 61-115 (2007).
Netanel, Neil Weinstock. Temptations of the walled garden: digital rights management and mobile phone carriers. 6 J. on Telecomm. & High Tech. L. 77-100 (2007).
New, John G. Patently wrong: the U.S. Supreme Court punts in the case of LabCorp v. Metabolite. 10 Vand. J. Ent. & Tech. L. 147-177 (2007).
O’Melinn, Liam Séamus. Software and shovels: how the intellectual property revolution is undermining traditional concepts of property. 76 U. Cin. L. Rev. 143-182 (2007).
Perritt, Henry H., Jr. Flanking the DRM Maginot Line against new music markets. 16 Mich. St. J. Int’l L. 113-151 (2007.
Risch, Michael. The failure of public notice in patent prosecution. 21 Harv. J.L. & Tech. 179-232 (2007).
Rothman, Jennifer E. The questionable use of custom in intellectual property. 93 Va. L. Rev. 1899-1982 (2007).
Rowe, Elizabeth A. Introducing a takedown for trade secrets on the Internet. 2007 Wis. L. Rev. 1041-1089.
Samuelson, Pamela and Jason Schultz. Should copyright owners have to give notice of their use of technical protection measures? 6 J. on Telecomm. & High Tech. L. 41-75 (2007).
Schnaps, Adi. Do consumers have the right to space-shift, as they do time-shift, their television content? Intellectual property rights in the face of new technology. 17 Seton Hall J. Sports & Ent. L. 51-91 (2007).
Sen, Shourin. The denial of a general performance right in sound recordings: a policy that facilitates our democratic civil society? 21 Harv. J.L. & Tech. 233-269 (2007).
Shipley, David E. Thin but not anorexic: copyright protection for compilations and other fact works. 15 J. Intell. Prop. L. 91-141 (2007).
Spulber, Daniel F. and Christopher S. Yoo. Mandating access to telecom and the Internet: the hidden side of Trinko. 107 Colum. L. Rev. 1822-1907 (2007).
Talar, Jessica L. My place or yours: copyright, place-shifting, & the Slingbox: a legislative proposal. 17 Seton Hall J. Sports & Ent. L. 25-50 (2007).
Torrance, Andrew W. Intellectual property as the third dimension of GMO regulation. 16 Kan. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 257-285 (2007).
Vethan, Charles M.R. The defenses of estoppel and implied license in copyright infringement claims in the online world: a case study. 49 S. Tex. L. Rev. 433-449 (2007).
70 ALBANY LAW REVIEW, NO. 4, PP. 1151-1642, 2007.
Symposium: Interdisciplinary Conference on the Impact of Technological Change on the Creation, Dissemination, and Protection of Intellectual Property. 70 Alb. L. Rev. 1151-1397 (2007).
Halpern, Sheldon W. Selections from the 2007 Albany Law School interdisciplinary conference on the impact of technological change on the creation, dissemination, and protection of intellectual property. 70 Alb. L. Rev. 1151-1153 (2007).
Long, Doris Estelle. Dissonant harmonization: limitations on “cash n’ carry” creativity. 70 Alb. L. Rev. 1163-1205 (2007).
Samuel, Dorit. Intellectual property valuation: a finance perspective. 70 Alb. L. Rev. 1207-1225 (2007).
Baron, Paula. The Moebius strip: private right and public use in copyright law. 70 Alb. L. Rev. 1227-1254 (2007).
Shipley, David E. Congressional authority over intellectual property policy after Eldred v. Ashcroft: deference, empty limitations, and risks to the public domain. 70 Alb. L. Rev. 1255-1295 (2007).
Guadamuz González, Andrés. Scale-free law: network science and copyright. 70 Alb. L. Rev. 1297-1329 (2007).
Gasaway, Laura N. Amending the Copyright Act for libraries and society: the Section 108 Study Group. 70 Alb. L. Rev. 1331-1356 (2007).
Leaffer, Marshall. The right of publicity: a comparative perspective. 70 Alb. L. Rev. 1357-1374 (2007).
Zimmerman, Diane L. Living without copyright in a digital world. 70 Alb. L. Rev. 1375-1397 (2007).
22 BERKELEY TECHNOLOGY LAW JOURNAL NO. 3, SUMMER, 2007.
Symposium: Copyright, Digital Rights Management Technology, and Consumer Protection. 22 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 971-1232 (2007).
Rosch, J. Thomas, Comm’r F.T.C. Keynote address: a different perspective on DRM. 22 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 971-980 (2007).
Reichman, Jerome H., Graeme B. Dinwoodie and Pamela Samuelson. A reverse notice and takedown regime to enable public interest uses of technically protected copyrighted works. 22 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 981-1060 (2007).
Helberger, Natali and P. Bernt Hugenholtz. No place like home for making a copy: private copying in European copyright law and consumer law. 22 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1061-1098 (2007).
Liu, Joseph P. Enabling copyright consumers. 22 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1099-1118 (2007)
Elkin-Koren, Niva. Making room for consumers under the DMCA. 22 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1119-1155 (2007).
Mulligan, Deirdre K. and Aaron K. Perzanowski. The magnificence of the disaster: reconstructing the Sony BMG rootkit incident. 22 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1157-1232 (2007).
2007 UTAH LAW REVIEW, NO. 3, PP. 537-859.
Symposium: Fixing Copyright. 2007 Utah L. Rev. 537-822.
Tehranian, John. Introduction: infringement nation: copyright reform and the law/norm gap. 2007 Utah L. Rev. 537-550.
Samuelson, Pamela. Leary Lecture. Preliminary thoughts on copyright reform. 2007 Utah L. Rev. 551-571.
Bell, Tom W. Codifying copyright’s misuse defense. 2007 Utah L. Rev. 573-586.
Burk, Dan L. Method and madness in copyright law. 2007 Utah L. Rev. 587-618.
Gordon, Wendy J. and Daniel Bahls. The public’s right to fair use: amending section 107 to avoid the “fared use” fallacy. 2007 Utah L. Rev. 619-658.
Hughes, Justin. American moral rights and fixing the Dastar “gap”. 2007 Utah L. Rev. 659-714.
Jaszi, Peter. Copyright, fair use and motion pictures. 2007 Utah L. Rev. 715-740.
Kwall, Roberta Rosenthal. Authors in disguise: why the Visual Artists Rights Act got it wrong. 2007 Utah L. Rev. 741-767.
Nimmer, David. Access denied. 2007 Utah L. Rev. 769-788.
Tushnet, Rebecca. Naming rights: attribution and law. 2007 Utah L. Rev. 789-822.

January 2008

Cahoy, Daniel R. Confronting myths and myopia on the road from Doha. 42 Ga. L. Rev. 131-192 (2007).
Fischer, James M. The “right” to injunctive relief for patent infringement. 24 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L.J. 1-29 (2007).
Frischmann, Brett M. and Barbara van Schewick. Network neutrality and the economics of an information superhighway: a reply to Professor Yoo. 47 Jurimetrics J. 383-428 (2007).
Liivak, Oskar. Maintaining competition in copying: narrowing the scope of gene patents. 41 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 177-238 (2007).
Lockridge, Lee Ann W. The myth of copyright’s fair use doctrine as a protector of free speech. 24 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L.J. 31-103 (2007).
Moffat, Viva R. Super-copyright: contracts, preemption, and the structure of copyright policymaking. 41 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 45-109 (2007).
Nard, Craig Allen and John F. Duffy. Rethinking patent law’s uniformity principle. 101 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1619-1675 (2007).
Nguyen, Xuan-Thao. Collateralizing intellectual property. 42 Ga. L. Rev. 1-45 (2007).
Plager, S. Jay and Lynne E. Pettigrew. Rethinking patent law’s uniformity principle: a response to Nard and Duffy. 101 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1735-1757 (2007).
Trombley, Sarah. Visions and revisions: fanvids and fair use. 25 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J. 647-685 (2007).
Tussey, Deborah. iPods and prairie fires: designing legal regimes for complex intellectual property systems. 24 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L.J. 105-130 (2007).

December 2007

Duffy, John F. Inventing invention: a case study of legal innovation. 86 Tex. L. Rev. 1-72 (2007).
Hovenkamp, Herbert. Restraints on innovation. 29 Cardozo L. Rev. 247-260 (2007).
Isaacs, Davida H. Not all property is created equal: why modern courts resist applying the Takings Clause to patents, and why they are right to do so. 15 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 1-43 (2007).
Lichtman, Doug and Mark A. Lemley. Rethinking patent law’s presumption of validity. 60 Stan. L. Rev. 45-72 (2007).
McCombs, David L., Phillip B. Philbin and Jacob G. Hodges. Intellectual property law. 60 SMU L. Rev. 1141-1167 (2007).
Reichman, Jerome H. and Rochelle Cooper Dreyfuss. Harmonization without consensus: critical reflections on drafting a substantive patent law treaty. 57 Duke L.J. 85-130 (2007).

November 2007

Abramowicz, Michael. The danger of underdeveloped patent prospects. 92 Cornell L. Rev. 1065-1121 (2007).
Baldia, Sonia. Intellectual property in global sourcing: the art of the transfer. 38 Geo. J. Int’l L. 499-528 (2007).
Barnett, Thomas O. Interoperability between antitrust and intellectual property. 14 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 859-870 (2007).
Depoorter, Ben and Sven Vanneste. Putting Humpty Dumpty back together: experimental evidence of anticommons tragedies. 3 J.L. Econ. & Pol’y 1-23 (2006).

Dinwoodie, Graeme B. and Mark D. Janis. Confusion over use: contextualism in trademark law. 92 Iowa L. Rev. 1597-1667 (2007).

Dogan, Stacey L. and Mark A. Lemley. Grounding trademark law through trademark use. 92 Iowa L. Rev. 1669-1701 (2007).
Dinwoodie, Graeme B. and Mark D. Janis. Lessons from the trademark use debate. 92 Iowa L. Rev. 1703-1721 (2007).
Feldman, Yuval and Janice Nadler. The law and norms of file sharing. 43 San Diego L. Rev. 577-618 (2006).
Fisher, William W. III. Melville B. Nimmer Memorial Lecture. When should we permit differential pricing of information? 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1-38 (2007).
Folsom, Thomas C. Missing the mark in cyberspace: misapplying trademark law to invisible and attenuated cases. 33 Rutgers Computer & Tech. L.J. 137-249 (2007).
Garfield, Alan E. The case for First Amendment limits on copyright law. 35 Hofstra L. Rev. 1169-1209 (2007).
Kerr, Orin S. Enforcing law online. (Reviewing Jack Goldsmith & Tim Wu, Who Controls the Internet?: Illusions of a Borderless World.) 74 U. Chi. L. Rev. 745-760 (2007).
Lipton, Jacqueline D. Commerce versus commentary: gripe sites, parody, and the First Amendment in cyberspace. 84 Wash. U. L. Rev. 1327-1374 (2006).
Menell, Peter S. The property rights movement’s embrace of intellectual property: true love or doomed relationship? 34 Ecology L.Q. 713-754 (2007).
Menell, Peter S. and David Nimmer. Legal realism in action: indirect copyright liability’s continuing tort framework and Sony’s de facto demise. 55 UCLA L. Rev. 143-204 (2007).
Menell, Peter S. and David Nimmer. Unwinding Sony. 95 Cal. L. Rev. 941-1025 (2007).
Parchomovsky, Gideon and Kevin A. Goldman. Fair use harbors. 93 Va. L. Rev. 1483-1532 (2007).
Patterson, Mark R. Contractual expansion of the scope of patent infringement through field-of-use licensing. 49 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 157-228 (2007).
Pollack, Malla. A listener’s free speech, a reader’s copyright. 35 Hofstra L. Rev. 1457-1487 (2007).
Vacca, Ryan. Expanding preferential treatment under the Record Rental Amendment beyond the music industry. 11 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 605-632 (2007).
Weckström, Katja. The lawfulness of criticizing big business: comparing approaches to the balancing of societal interests behind trademark protection. 11 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 671-700 (2007).

October 2007

Marrella, Fabrizio and Christopher S. Yoo. Is open source software the new lex mercatoria? 47 Va. J. Int’l L. 807-837 (2007).
Mossoff, Adam. Patents as constitutional private property: the historical protection of patents under the Takings Clause. 87 B.U. L. Rev. 689-724 (2007).
Nemec, Douglas R. and Emily J. Zelenock. Rethinking the rule of the written description requirement in claim construction: whatever happened to “possession is nine-tenths of the law?” 8 Minn. J.L. Sci. & Tech. 357-408 (2007).
Raustiala, Kal and Stephen R. Munzer. The global struggle over geographic indications. 18 Eur. J. Int’l L. 337-365 (2007).
Robins, Kendra. Extraterritorial patent enforcement and multinational patent litigation: proposed guidelines for the U.S. courts. 93 Va. L. Rev. 1259-1314 (2007).
Weckström, Katja. When two giants collide: Article 17 and the scope of trademark protection afforded under the TRIPS Agreement. 29 Loy. L.A. Int’l & Comp. L. Rev. 167-200 (2007).
Commercial Speech in an Age of Emerging Technology and Corporate Scandal. 58 S.C. L. Rev. 665-994 (2007).
Yen, Alfred C. Commercial speech jurisprudence and copyright in commercial information works. 58 S.C. L. Rev. 665-682 (2007).
Goodman, Ellen P. Peer promotions and false advertising law. 58 S.C. L. Rev. 683-707 (2007).
LaFrance, Mary. No reason to live: dilution laws as unconstitutional restrictions on commercial speech. 58 S.C. L. Rev. 709-723 (2007).
Tushnet, Rebecca. Trademark law as commercial speech regulation. 58 S.C. L. Rev. 737-756 (2007).
Antitrust and Intellectual Property in Global Context: A Symposium in Celebration of the Work of Lawrence A. Sullivan. 13 Sw. J.L. & Trade Americas 211-375 (2007).
Fox, Eleanor M. Economic development, poverty and antitrust: the other path. 13 Sw. J.L. & Trade Americas 211-236 (2007).
Lemley, Mark A. A new balance between IP and antitrust. 13 Sw. J.L. & Trade Americas 237-256 (2007).
Pitofsy, Robert. Comments on Lemley: an introduction to IP and antitrust. 13 Sw. J.L. & Trade Americas 257-260 (2007).
Eilmansberger, Thomas. IP and antitrust in the European Union. 13 Sw. J.L. & Trade Americas 261-279 (2007).
Leslie, Christopher R. The role of consumers in Walker Process litigation. 13 Sw. J.L. & Trade Americas 281-312 (2007).
Carstensen, Peter C. Professor Leslie’s reluctant embrace of patent fraud victims: reflections on the role of consumers in Walker Process litigation. 13 Sw. J.L. & Trade Americas 313-324 (2007).
Badal, Robert G., John M. Landry and Kirk A. Hornbeck. Speculation, overdeterrence, and consumer standing in Walker Process litigation: a response to Professor Leslie. 13 Sw. J.L. & Trade Americas 325-334 (2007).
Grimes, Warren S. and Lawrence A. Sullivan. Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc.: requirements tie-ins and intellectual property. 13 Sw. J.L. & Trade Americas 335-354 (2007.
Bush, Darren. Ties, damned ties, and efficiencies: a response to Grimes and Sullivan’s “metered tying”. 13 Sw. J.L. & Trade Americas 355-368 (2007).
Blecher, Maxwell M. Luncheon remarks, Southwestern Law School, February 23, 2007: the “future” of antitrust. 13 Sw. J.L. & Trade Americas 369-375 (2007).

Symposium: Frontiers of Intellectual Property. 85 Tex. L. Rev. 1579-2173 (2007).

I. Software

Allison, John R., Abe Dunn and Ronald J. Mann. Software patents, incumbents, and entry. 85 Tex. L. Rev. 1579-1625 (2007).
Merges, Robert P. Software and patent scope: a report from the middle innings. 85 Tex. L. Rev. 1627-1676 (2007).

II. Biotech

Adelman, David E. and Kathryn L. DeAngelis. Patent metrics: the mismeasure of innovation in the biotech patent debate. 85 Tex. L. Rev. 1677-1744 (2007).
Kumar, Sapna and Arti Rai. Synthetic biology: the intellectual property puzzle. 85 Tex. L. Rev. 1745-1768 (2007).
Commentary: Allison, John R. and Thomas W. Sager. Valuable patents redux: on the enduring merit of using patent characteristics to identify valuable patents. 85 Tex. L. Rev. 1769-1797 (2007).

III. Copyright

Bracha, Oren. Standing copyright law on its head? The Googlization of everything and the many faces of property. 85 Tex. L. Rev. 1799-1869 (2007).
Litman, Jessica. Lawful personal use. 85 Tex. L. Rev. 1871-1920 (2007).
Samuelson, Pamela. Why copyright law excludes sys-tems and processes from the scope of its protection. 85 Tex. L. Rev. 1921-1977 (2007).
Commentary: Reese, R. Anthony. a map of the frontiers of copyright. 85 Tex. L. Rev. 1979-1990 (2007).

IV. Patent Reform

Lemley, Mark A. and Carl Shapiro. Patent holdup and royalty stacking. 85 Tex. L. Rev. 1991-2049 (2007).
Petherbridge, Lee and R. Polk Wagner. The Federal Circuit and patentability: an empirical assessment of the law of obviousness. 85 Tex. L. Rev. 2051-2110 (2007).
Commentary: Golden, John M. “Patent trolls” and patent remedies. 85 Tex. L. Rev. 2111-2161 (2007).
Reply: Lemley, Mark A. and Carl Shapiro. Patent holdup and royalty stacking. 85 Tex. L. Rev. 2163-2173 (2007).

September 2007

Burk, Dan L. and Brett H. McDonnell. Patents, tax shelters, and the firm. 26 Va. Tax Rev. 981-1004 (2007).
Cotter, Thomas F. A Burkean perspective on patent eligibility. 22 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 855-896 (2007).
Hoffstadt, Brian M. Dispossession, intellectual property, and the sin of theoretical homogeneity. 80 S. Cal. L. Rev. 909-967 (2007).
Lefstin, Jeffrey A. Claim construction, appeal, and the predictability of interpretive regimes. 61 U. Miami L. Rev. 1033-1067 (2007).
Mandell, Craig W. Balance of powers: recognizing the Uruguay Round Agreement Act’s anti-bootlegging provisions as a constitu-tional exercise of Congress’s Commerce Clause authority. 54 J. Copyright Soc’y U.S.A. 673-717 (2007).
Menell, Peter S. Bankruptcy treatment of intellectual property assets: an economic analysis. 22 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 733-823 (2007).
Mossoff, Adam. Who cares what Thomas Jefferson thought about patents? Reevaluating the patent “privilege” in historical context. 92 Cornell L. Rev. 953-1012 (2007).
Snow, Ned. A copyright conundrum: protecting email privacy. 55 U. Kan. L. Rev. 501-574 (2007).
Cultural Environmentalism @ 10. Special Editors: James Boyle and Lawrence Lessig. 70 Law & Contemp. Probs. 1-232 (2007).
Lessig, Lawrence. Foreword. 70 Law & Contemp. Probs. 1-3 (2007).
Boyle, James. Cultural environmentalism and beyond. 70 Law & Contemp. Probs. 5-21 (2007).
Van Houweling, Molly Shaffer. Cultural environmentalism and the constructed commons. 70 Law & Contemp. Probs. 23-50 (2007).
Crawford, Susan P. Network rules. 70 Law & Contemp. Probs. 51-90 (2007).
Cohen, Julie E. Network stories. 70 Law & Contemp. Probs. 91-95 (2007).
Sunder, Madhavi. The invention of traditional knowledge. 70 Law & Contemp. Probs. 97-124 (2007).
Rai, Arti K. The ends of intellectual property: health as a case study. 70 Law & Contemp. Probs. 125-130 (2007).
Fisher, William. Two thoughts about traditional knowl-edge. 70 Law & Contemp. Probs. 131-133 (2007).
Tushnet, Rebecca. Payment in credit: copyright law and subcultural creativity. 70 Law & Contemp. Probs. 135-174 (2007).
Litman, Jessica. Creative reading. 70 Law & Contemp. Probs. 175-183 (2007).
Lemley, Mark A. Should a licensing market require li-censing? 70 Law & Contemp. Probs. 185-203 (2007).
Vaidhyanathan, Siva. The anarchist in the coffee house: a brief consideration of local culture, the free culture movement, and prospects for a global public sphere. 70 Law & Contemp. Probs. 205-210 (2007).
Symposium: Closing in on Open Science: Trends in Intellectual Property & Scientific Research. 59 Me. L. Rev. xi-xiii, 259-437 (2007).
Galbraith, Christine D. Foreword. 59 Me. L. Rev. xi-xiii (2007).
Mireles, Michael S. Adoption of the Bayh-Dole Act in developed countries: added pressure for a broad research exemption in the United States? 59 Me. L. Rev. 259-282 (2007).
Rowe, Elizabeth A. The experimental use exception to patent infringement: do universities deserve special treatment? 59 Me. L. Rev. 283-313 (2007).
Opderbeck, David W. A virtue-centered approach to the biotechnology commons (or, the virtuous penguin). 59 Me. L. Rev. 315-337 (2007).
Petherbridge, Lee. Road map to revolution? Patent-based open science. 59 Me. L. Rev. 339-383 (2007).
Joly, Yann. Open source approaches in biotechnology: Utopia revisited. 59 Me. L. Rev. 385-405 (2007).
Osenga, Kristen. Rembrandts in the research lab: why universities should take a lesson from big business to increase innovation. 59 Me. L. Rev. 407-437 (2007).

August 2007

Abdel-khalik, Jasmine. To live in in-”fame”-y: reconceiving scan-dalous marks as analogous to famous marks. 25 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J. 173-236 (2007).
Abramson, Bruce. Intellectual property and the alleged collapsing of aftermarkets. 38 Rutgers L.J. 399-472 (2007).
Arezzo, Emanuela. Struggling around the “natural” divide: the protection of tangible and intangible indigenous property. 25 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J. 367-415 (2007).
Blythe, Stephen E. Singapore computer law: an international trend-setter with a moderate degree of technological neutrality. 33 Ohio N.U. L. Rev. 525-562 (2007).
Budylin, Sergey and Yulia Osipova. Total upgrade: intellectual proerty law reform in Russia. 1 Colum. J. E. Eur. L. 1-39 (2007).
Carrier, Michael A. Pictures at the New Economy Ex-hibition: why the Antitrust Modernization Commission got it (mostly) right. 38 Rutgers L.J. 473-492 (2007)
Colbert, Stephana I. and Oren R. Griffin. The TEACH Act: recog-nizing its challenges and overcoming its limitations. 33 J.C. & U.L. 499-520 (2007).
Durham, Alan L. Trademarks and the landscape of imagina-tion. 79 Temp. L. Rev. 1181-1225 (2006).
First, Harry. Controlling the intellectual property grab: protect innovation, not innovators. 38 Rutgers L.J. 365-398 (2007).
Foer, Albert A. On whether there really is an IP grab: an introduction to the Symposium Issue. 38 Rutgers L.J. 359-364 (2007).
Frumes, Howard M., Susan Cleary and Lorin Brennan. Developing an Internet and wireless license agreement for motion pictures and television programming. 1 J. Int’l Media & Ent. L. 283-319 (2007).
Gerhardt, Deborah R. The 2006 Trademark Dilution Revision Act rolls out a luxury claim and a parody exemption. 8 N.C. J.L. & Tech. 205-230 (2007)
Hricik, David. Mining for embedded data: is it ethical to take intentional advantage of other people’s failures? 8 N.C. J.L. & Tech. 231-247 (2007).
Leary, Matthew. Adverse to what?: The increasing value of patent opinions after Knorr-Bremse. 25 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J. 271-302 (2007).
Magliocca, Gerard N. Blackberries and barnyards: patent trolls and the perils of innovaiton. 82 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1809-1838 (2007).
Majoras, Deborah Platt. A government perspective on IP and antitrust law. 38 Rutgers L.J. 493-507 (2007).
McKenna, Mark P. The normative foundations of trademark law. 82 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1839-1916 (2007).
Medenica, Olivera and Kaiser Wahab. Does liability enhance credibility?: Lessons from the MDCA applied to online defa-mation. 25 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J. 237-269 (2007).
Melone, Matthew A. The patenting of tax strategies: a patently un-necessary development. 5 DePaul Bus. & Com. L.J. 437-485 (2007).
Michelotti, Joseph N., M.D. Genes as intellectual property. 11 J. Med. & L. 71-88 (2007).
Morrow, Joshua. Casenote. (eBay, Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C., 126 S. Ct. 1837, 2006.) 33 Ohio N.U. L. Rev. 743-754 (2007).
Nelson, Philip B. Patent pools: an economic assessment of current law and policy. 38 Rutgers L.J. 539-572 (2007).
Oppenheimer, Max Stul. Harmonization through condemnation: is New London the key to world patent harmony? 40 Vand. J. Transnat’l L. 445-502 (2007).
Pessach, Guy. Museums, digitization and copyright law: taking stock and looking ahead. 1 J. Int’l Media & Ent. L. 253-282 (2007).
Pulsinelli, Gary. Freedom to explore: using the Eleventh Amendment to liberate researchers at state universities from liability for intellectual property infringements. 82 Wash. L. Rev. 275-376 (2007).
Rubin, Jonathan L. Patents, antitrust, and rivalry in standard-setting. 38 Rutgers L.J. 509-538 (2007).
Schwartz, Andrew A. The Patent Office meets the poison pill: why legal methods cannot be patented. 20 Harv. J.L. & Tech. 333-372 (2007).
Sicker, Douglas C., Paul Ohm and student Shannon Gunaji. The analog hole and the price of music: an empirical study. 5 J. on Telecomm. & High Tech. L. 573-587 (2007).
Smith, Henry E. Intellectual property as property: delineating entitlements in information. 116 Yale L.J. 1742-1822 (2007).
Solum, Lawrence B. Constitutional texting. 44 San Diego L. Rev. 123-151 (2007).
Symposium: Constitutional Challenges to Copyright. 30 Colum. J.L. & Arts 245-679 (2007).
- Besek, June. Introduction. 30 Colum. J.L. & Arts 245-246 (2007).
- Peters, Marybeth. Keynote address. 30 Colum. J.L. & Arts 246-257 (2007).
- Panel Discussions:
- Congressional Power and Limitations Inherent in the Copyright Clause. Moderator: Jane Ginsburg; panelists: Chris Sprigman, Tony Reese and Graeme Austin. 30 Colum. J.L. & Arts 259-285 (2007).
- Alternatives to the Copyright Power: The Relationship of the Copyright Clause to the Commerce Clause and the Treaty Power. Moderator: Tim Wu; panelists: Thomas Nachbar, Dotan Oliar and Graeme Dinwoodie. 30 Colum. J.L. & Arts 287-317 (2007).
- Copyright and Freedom of Expression. Moderator: Clarisa Long; panelists: Paul Bender, Robert Kasunic, Joseph Liu and Rebecca Tushnet. 30 Colum. J.L. & Arts 319-336 (2007).
- Austin, Graeme W. International copyright law and domestic constitutional doctrines. 30 Colum. J.L. & Arts 337-347 (2007).
- Bender, Paul. Copyright and the First Amendment after Eldred v. Ashcroft. 30 Colum. J.L. & Arts 349-354 (2007).
- Dinwoodie, Graeme B. Copyright lawmaking authority: an (inter)nationalist perspective on the Treaty Clause. 30 Colum. J.L. & Arts 355-395 (2007).
- Kasunic, Robert. Preserving the traditional contours of copyright. 30 Colum. J.L. & Arts 397-427 (2007).
- Liu, Joseph P. Copyright and breathing space. 30 Colum. J.L. & Arts 429-451 (2007).
- Nachbar, Thomas B. The comedy of the market. 30 Colum. J.L. & Arts 453-466 (2007).
- Oliar, Dotan. Resolving conflicts among Congress’s powers regarding statutes’ constitutionality: the case of anti-bootleg-ging statutes. 30 Colum. J.L. & Arts 467-508 (2007).
- Peters, Marybeth. Constitutional challenges to copyright law. 30 Colum. J.L. & Arts 509-529 (2007).
- Reese, R. Anthony. Is the public domain permanent?: Congress’s power to grant exclusive rights in unpublished public domain works. 30 Colum. J.L. & Arts 531-563 (2007).
- Sprigman, Christopher. Indirect enforcement of the Intel-lectual Property Clause. 30 Colum. J.L. & Arts 565-595 (2007).
Williams, Matt. Recent Second Circuit opinions indicate that Google’s Library Project is not transformative. 25 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J. 303-332 (2007).
Yu, Peter K. The international enclosure movement. 82 Ind. L.J. 827-907 (2007).

July 2007

Carroll, Michael W. Fixing fair use. 85 N.C. L. Rev. 1087-1154 (2007).

Dolak, Lisa A. Power or prudence: toward a better standard for evaluating patent litigants’ access to the declaratory judgment remedy. 41 U.S.F.L. Rev. 407-443 (2007).

Herberholz, Dana M. Curing confusion: an overview of the regulatory complexities of obtaining pharmaceutical trademarks and a prescription for reform. 8 Minn. J. L. Sci. & Tech. 97-126 (2007).

Kemp, Deborah J. and Lynn M. Forsythe. Trademarks and geographical indications: a case of California champagne. 10 Chapman L. Rev. 257-298 (2006).

Perritt, Henry H., Jr. New architectures for music: law should get out of the way. 29 Hastings Comm. & Ent. L.J. 259-358 (2007).

Richards, Kristin. Evolution in slow motion: opting into a digital world. 29 Hastings Comm. & Ent. L.J. 447-465 (2007.

Sag, Matthew and Kurt Rohde. Patent reform and differential impact. 8 Minn. J. L. Sci. & Tech. 1-96 (2007).

Valkonen, Sami J. and Lawrence J. White. An economic model for the incentive/access paradigm of copyright prop-ertization: an argument in support of the Orphan Works Act. 29 Hastings Comm. & Ent. L.J. 359-400 (2007).

Wanat, Daniel E. Copyright law, contract law, and preemption under § 301(a) of the Copyright Act of 1976: a study in judicial labeling or mislabeling and a proposed alternative. 31 Vt. L. Rev. 707-733 (2007).

Braucher, Jean. Contracting out of Article 2 using a “license” label: a strategy that should not work for software products. 40 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 261-279 (2006).
Ewelukwa, Uche U. Comparative trademark law: fair use defense in the United States and Europe--the changing land-scape of trademark law. 13 Widener L. Rev. 97-168 (2006).
Folsom, Thomas C. Defining cyberspace (finding real virtue in the place of virtual reality). 9 Tul. J. Tech. & Intell. Prop. 75-121 (2007).
Garza Barbosa, Roberto. Revisiting international copyright law. 8 Barry L. Rev. 43-110 (2007).
Greene, Maj. Michael Kenneth, Staff Judge Advocate, U.S. Air Force. Patent law in government contracts: does it best serve the Department of Defense’s mission? 36 Pub. Cont. L.J. 331-359 (2007).
McDaniel, Katherine L. Accounting for taste: an analysis of tax-and-reward alternative compensation schemes. 9 Tul. J. Tech. & Intell. Prop. 235-312 (2007).
Mota, Sue Ann. eBay v. MercExchange: traditional four-factor test for injunctive relief applies to patent cases, according to the Supreme Court. 40 Akron L. Rev. 529-543 (2007).
Noga, Krystal E. Securitizing copyrights: an answer to the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act. 9 Tul. J. Tech. & Intell. Prop. 1-73 (2007).
Osenga, Kristen. Linguistics and patent claim construction. 38 Rutgers L.J. 61-108 (2006).
Pierce, Vanessa Bowman. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, shouldn’t it be a duck?: How a “functional” approach ameliorates the discontinuity between the “primary significance” tests for genericness and secondary meaning. 37 N.M. L. Rev. 147-187 (2007).
Rambarran, Ian and Robert Hunt. Are browse-wrap agreements all they are wrapped up to be? 9 Tul. J. Tech. & Intell. Prop. 173-203 (2007).
Strahilevitz, Lior Jacob. Wealth without markets? (Reviewing Yochai Benkler, The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom.) 116 Yale L.J. 1472-1516 (2007).
Tritt, Lee-ford. Liberating estates law from the constraints of copyright. 38 Rutgers L.J. 109-190 (2006).
Vinciguerra, Vincenzo. Contribution to the understanding of the public domain. 24 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 411-454 (2006).

June 2007

Barrett, Margreth. Domain names, trademarks and the First Amendment: searching for meaningful boundaries. 39 Conn. L. Rev. 973-1050 (2007).
Beckman, Sydney Aaron. From CD to MP3: compression in the new age of technology[:] overlooked infringement or fair use? 42 Gonz. L. Rev. 469-500 (2006/07).
Cardi, W. Jonathan. Über-middleman: reshaping the broken landscape of music copyright. 92 Iowa L. Rev. 835-890 (2007).
Cheng, Tai-Heng. Power, norms, and international intellectual property law. 28 Mich. J. Int’l L. 109-155 (2006).
Doellinger, Chad J. A new theory of trademarks. 111 Penn St. L. Rev. 823-861 (2007).
Farley, Christine Haight and Geri L. Haight. Review of the 2006 trademark decisions of the Federal Circuit. 56 Am. U. L. Rev. 987-1022 (2007).
Folami, Akilah N. From Habermans to “get rich or die tryin”: hip hop, the Telecommunications Act of 1996, and the Black public sphere. 12 Mich. J. Race & L. 235-304 (2007).
Goldman, Brian. Putting Lamborghini doors on the Escalade: a legal analysis of the unauthorized use of brand names in rap/hip-hop. 8 Tex. Rev. Ent. & Sports L. 1-32 (2007).
Gruner, Richard S. In search of the undiscovered country: the challenge of describing patentable subject matter. 23 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L.J. 395-445 (2007)
Hahn, Robert W. and Anne Layne-Farrar. The law and economics of software security. 30 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 283-353 (2006).
Heald, Paul J. Transaction costs and patent reform. 23 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L.J. 447-462 (2007).
Ho, Cynthia M. Lessons from Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings v. Metabolite Laboratories, Inc. 23 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L.J. 463-487 (2007).
Holbrook, Timothy R. The expressive impact of patents. 84 Wash. U. L. Rev. 573-622 (2006).
Hricik, David. Patent agents: the person you are. 20 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 261-285 (2007).
Katyal, Sonia K. Semiotic disobedience. 84 Wash. U. L. Rev. 489-571 (2006).
Kuruk, Paul. Goading a reluctant dinosaur: mutual recognition agreements as a policy response to the misappropriation of foreign traditional knowledge in the United States. 34 Pepp. L. Rev. 629-713 (2007).
Kuruk, Paul. The role of customary law under sui generis frameworks of intellectual property rights in traditional and indigenous knowledge. 17 Ind. Int’l & Comp. L. Rev. 67-118 (2007).
Lastowka, Greg. Digital attribution: copyright and the right to credit. 87 B.U. L. Rev. 41-89 (2007).
Lefstin, Jeffrey A. The measure of the doubt: dissent, indeterminacy, and interpretation at the Federal Circuit. 58 Hastings L.J. 1025-1094 (2007).
Lidsky, Lyrissa Barnett and Thomas F. Cotter. Authorship, audiences, and anonymous speech. 82 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1537-1603 (2007).
Lemley, Mark A. Should patent infringement require proof of copying? 105 Mich. L. Rev. 1525-1536 (2007).
Long, Alex B. [Insert song lyrics here]: the uses and misuses of popular music lyrics in legal writing. 64 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 531-579 (2007).
Miller, Joseph Scott. Standard setting, patents, and access lock-in: RAND licensing and the theory of the firm. 40 Ind. L. Rev. 351-395 (2007).
Rigamonti, Cyrill P. The conceptual transformation of moral rights. 55 Am. J. Comp. L. 67-122 (2007).
Samuels, Jeffrey M. and Linda B. Samuels. The trademark jurisprudence of Judge Rich. 56 Am. U. L. Rev. 761-791 (2007).
Symposium: Ethical Reflections on the Future of Technology Policy. 18 Stan. L. & Pol’y Rev. 1-189 (2007).
Granick, Jennifer. Introduction. 18 Stan. L. & Pol’y Rev. 1-5 (2007).
Boucher, U.S. Rep. Rick. Limiting progress of science and useful arts: legislating as a means of enhancing market leverage. 18 Stan. L. & Pol’y Rev. 7-20 (2007).
Goldberg, Steven. Technology unbound: will funded libertarianism dominate the future? 18 Stan. L. & Pol’y Rev. 21-33 (2007).
Baird, Stacy. The government at the standards bazaar. 18 Stan. L. & Pol’y Rev. 35-100 (2007).
Opderbeck, David W. The penguin’s paradox: the political economy of international intellectual property and the paradox of open intellectual property models. 18 Stan. L. & Pol’y Rev. 101-159 (2007).
Korobkin, Russell. Stem cell research and the cloning wars. 18 Stan. L. & Pol’y Rev. 161-189 (2007).
Symposium: Patents and Diversity in Innovation Policy Conference. 13 Mich. Telecomm. & Tech. L. Rev. 389-539 (2007).
Kahin, Brian. Patents and diversity in innovation. 13 Mich. Telecomm. & Tech. L. Rev. 389-399 (2007).
Armitage, Robert A. The myth of inherent and inevitable “industry differences”: “diversity” as artifact in the quest for patent reforms. 13 Mich. Telecomm. & Tech. L. Rev. 401-419 (2007).
Carroll, Michael W. Patent injunctions and the problem of uniformity cost. 13 Mich. Telecomm. & Tech. L. Rev. 421-443 (2007).
Dinwoodie, Graeme B. and Rochelle C. Dreyfuss. Diversi-fying without discriminating: complying with the man-dates of the TRIPS Agreement. 13 Mich. Telecomm. & Tech. L. Rev. 445-456 (2007).
Hunt, Robert M. Economics and the design of patent systems. 13 Mich. Telecomm. & Tech. L. Rev. 457-470 (2007)
Dosi, Giovanni, Luigi Marengo and Corrado Pasquali. Knowledge, competition and innovation: is strong IPR protection really needed for more and better innovations? 13 Mich. Telecomm. & Tech. L. Rev. 471-485 (2007).
Menell, Peter S. A method for reforming the patent sys-tem. 13 Mich. Telecomm. & Tech. L. Rev. 487-508 (2007).
Nielsen, Carol M. and Michael R. Samardzija. Compulsory patent licensing: is it a viable solution in the United States? 13 Mich. Telecomm. & Tech. L. Rev. 509-539 (2007).
Vermont, Samson. The angel is in the big picture: a response to Lemley. 105 Mich. L. Rev. 1537-1544 (2007).
Werbach, Kevin. Sensors and sensibilities. 28 Cardozo L. Rev. 2321-2371 (2007).

May 2007

Allison, John R. and Mark A. Lemley. The (unnoticed) demise of the doctrine of equivalents. 59 Stan. L. Rev. 955-984 (2007).
Aoki, Keith. Distributive and syncretic motives in intellectual property law (with special reference to coercion, agency, and development). 40 UC Davis L. Rev. 717-801 (2007).
Austin, Arthur. Parsing the plagiary scandals in history and law. 5 Pierce L. Rev. 367-411 (2007).
Bartow, Ann. Trademarks of privilege: naming right