Many who follow technology and intellectual property know Larry Lessigâ€™s work. His work has even inspired odd Austrians to compose odes to him. His books have already become touchstones for those fighting in the copyright wars. Nonetheless, one part of Lessigâ€™s work, Free Culture, deserves special notice. (the link takes one to, of course, a free version of the book). It is the part about the Eldred case. For in it Lessig offers a humble and inspiring account of his work on the case. His retelling of what happened and most importantly of where he may have gone wrong in arguing the case offers a glimpse of someone willing to reflect on his acts and rather than rage against the Court direct his energy into seeing what went wrong. In addition, the tale shows how ideal law theory may not play out in the courts. It shows that sometimes the courts may not be ready for the case. It shows that policy and politics can and do animate decisions. Indeed, Lessig admits that whereas in other contexts he used persuasion regarding the urgency and importance of limited terms for copyright, here he chose to argue the pure Constitutional ideal at stake. Thus even if one is not interested in intellectual property law, take a read of the chapter on Eldred. It is an impressive lesson in litigation and policy advocacy taught by a brilliant instructor. If he could err in this way, so could anyone. So read it, appreciate it, and learn from it.