The federal district court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, headquartered in Pittsburgh, has adopted a set of local patent rules for all new patent filings. The rules are effective as of January 1, 2005 and differ in a number of respects from the well-known rules effective in the Northern District of California (i.e., San Francisco and San Jose).
The rules are available via the court’s homepage.
The rules are the product of a year’s work by the local patent bar, working under the supervision of the court, and are simultaneously (i) an effort to design a more efficient system of trial-level patent litigation and (ii) an effort to use (i) to attract more patent litigation to Pittsburgh. Are the rules really “better”? Are litigants likely to select a forum (if they have a choice of forum) based on “better” rules? And if they do, is this good for the local bar? We’ll see.
1 response so far ↓
1 madisonian.net » Designing a Patent System // Sep 8, 2005 at 1:37 pm
[...] A while back, I posted a note about the fact that the federal District Court in the Western District of Pennsylvania (a.k.a., mostly, Pittsburgh) has adopted a set of Local Rules specifically to govern patent cases. Pittsburgh is the third court to do this; San Francisco (Northern District of California) and Atlanta (Northern District of Georgia) also have their own rules. [...]