According to [a] memo, “USC’s purpose is to promote and foster the creation and lawful use of intellectual property.” It’s hard to imagine a more shocking statement in an official university communiquÃ©. If this statement were true, then the measure of USC’s success would be the number of patents filed and the number of copyrights registered rather than the amount of original research undertaken, the number of diplomas granted, [or] the volume of citations in scholarly journals . . . .
This reminds me of an anecdote about Edison’s efforts to get a copyright on every frame of a film. He failed…but the slow decline of de minimis exceptions to infringement have made his position the winner in the long run. Even the tiniest bit of sampling can be an infringement, outside text-world.
It also brings to mind the troubling tendency of quantitative rankings to overtake assessments of quality–both in science and the humanities. Some countries are getting a bit more self-conscious about this trend. Until we fully acknowledge the granularity of such measurements, we are consigned to encouraging
like blossoms on the branches
more downloads per word.
As in so much else, Jim Chen is ahead of the curve here!