Law & Technology

Well, I missed my own blog’s symposium on Madhavi Sunder’s new book, From Goods to a Good Life: Intellectual Property and Global Justice. (I think I need a course called “Time Management and the Good Life.”) But I did read a chapter that is available online, here.  I look forward to reading the whole book, but I wanted to highlight this part of it for those interested in patent law and related pharma IP rights.

The chapter focuses on access to drugs in less developed countries (LDCs), and makes the following case:

Not too long ago, an HIV-positive diagnosis was tantamount to a death sentence — for people in the East and the West, in the South and the North. The drug companies that perfected the antiretroviral therapies invested princely sums to find these miracle cures. To justify their investment, they rely on the promise of a patent . . . . Thus patents have saved countless lives. But this structure has its limits. Indeed, the evidence is mounting that in crucial ways patents fail to promote the health of people in the developing world, and in some cases in the developed world as well.

The chapter begins by telling the moving story of Thembisa Mkhosana, one of thousands of South Africans who cannot afford the third-line antiretroviral treatments needed to survive AIDS.   “My blood test results have worsened dramatically,” Mkhosana told a reporter, “And now I suddenly have fever and am in pain. I’m really worried.”  “I know that I’m going to die,” she said, but “who is going to look after my children?”  Her story appears in this video.
Read More »Sunder on Patents and Access to Drugs